Going off, leaving the furniture in charge

The Monitor’s language columnist is reminded that bureaucracy is literally ‘rule by desks.’

Christian Hartmann/Reuters
Emmanuel Macron, president of France and a graduate of the École Nationale d’Administration, celebrates on the stage at his victory rally near the Louvre in Paris, France on May 7, 2017.

An expatriate journalist’s account of the red tape involved in getting her French driver’s license caught my eye the other day.

She expressed a certain grudging admiration for something Americans aren’t used to regarding positively: bureaucracy. But the French do take their bureaucracy seriously. Their École Nationale d’Administration, the National School of Administration, has produced more French presidents and prime ministers than Harvard has produced US presidents, despite Harvard’s 300-year-plus head start (ENA goes back only to 1945).

The writer noted in passing: “[T]he French invented a term that means, literally, government by desks.”

Really? Indeed, yes. And quite a bit of terminology for government, and governance, stems from furniture metaphors.

The Online Etymology Dictionary credits French economist Jean Claude Marie Vincent de Gournay (1712-59) with coining the term la bureaucratie, analogous with aristocracy (“rule of the best [citizens]”) or democracy (power or rule of the people). And yes, bureau really meant “desk.”

By 1815 his coinage had made it across the English Channel. The Oxford English Dictionary’s first usage example of it cites The Times of London: “that complication of intrigues of wheels within wheels, which is called bureaucracy.”

Among other examples of furniture as governance: secretary. In the late 14th century it meant a “person entrusted with secrets,” a trusted counselor, with some letter-writing and note-taking duties. The word has since bifurcated to refer either to the kind of secretary who nowadays prefers to be known as an executive assistant, thank you, or the kind who heads an executive department of the federal government.

But secretary has also long been used to mean a desk for keeping secret papers.

Then there’s board, as in a board of directors. It was originally the table around which directors sat; it later came to mean the directors themselves. (And of course the “chair” heads the “board.”)

Cabinet is, etymologically, a small room, related to our cabin.

Originally it was a case, and later a piece of furniture, for keeping papers or other valuable items. By 1600 a “cabinet” was a private room where ministers met. By the mid-1600s, cabinet had acquired its modern political meaning: the chief advisers of a head of government.

But back to our desks for a moment. 

Who sits at the desks of bureaucracy? Bureaucrats. It’s not a term of praise. And the would-be alternative term civil servant is conspicuous by its absence from American English. Indeed, it “shines” or “sparkles” by its absence, as the French idiom has it (briller par son absence).

But for all the suggestions that “bureaucracy” is some vast soulless machinery cranking away – as in the Times quote – there are human beings at those desks. This is why it’s possible for an American president to head off on a major trip with several of his top advisers and know things will keep running back at home.

Etymology aside, they aren’t just going off and leaving the furniture in charge.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Going off, leaving the furniture in charge
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today