How I became a reader of books

My parents encouraged me in ways I didn’t realize until much later.

Melanie Stetson Freeman/Staff
Central Park, New York City

When I was a boy, my parents read the daily newspaper, and my mom read Woman’s Day, but I don’t recall either of them ever reading a book. And yet, they must have recognized the importance of books, because for my 11th Christmas they gave me the first book I ever owned – “The Tales of Edgar Allan Poe.” I distinctly remember opening it, reading the first lines of “The Cask of Amontillado,” and remarking to myself, “So this is what reading is!” My delight was unbounded. Little did I know at the time that I was at the beginning of a lifelong journey.

So, if I confronted my first real book at the advanced age of 11, what was I reading before then? In a word, readers: relatively plotless, plodding, repetitive if well-intentioned attempts to teach children to recognize letters and their sounds and to build their vocabularies. Being a dutiful first son, I went through the motions, and I learned what words were. But I still had no idea what writing was.

Until Poe. Look here at the opening line of “The Cask of Amontillado”: “The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge.”

I didn’t yet know who Fortunato was, but I was acquainted with “injuries” and “revenge.” They were dark words, at the leading edge of Poe’s story, nestled in a sentence more complex and stylish than anything I had ever read before. Certainly more complex and stylish than “Run, Spot. Run, run, run. Oh, oh, oh. Funny, funny Spot.” And more challenging than the very short tales about poor children and loyal friends that were in the “Dick and Jane” readers. (Spot was their dog.)

I don’t mean to be harsh on the readers. They must have accomplished their objective, because I and my classmates certainly did learn the fundamental skill of reading from them. But that’s exactly the problem – they kindled a skill, but not affection, for the written word. That was left to Poe, whose ornate language, I admit, sometimes bamboozled me. But it was real language, charged language, language worth grappling with, and the payoff was enormous.

Poe, in short, was a springboard. My parents gave me that first book, but then I went off on my own. I liked science, which led me to discover Jules Verne and H.G. Wells. I wound up favoring the latter. Look at the first sentence of “The Invisible Man”: “The stranger came early in February, one wintry day, through a biting wind and a driving snow, the last snowfall of the year, over the down, walking as it seemed from Bramblehurst railway station, and carrying a little black portmanteau in his thickly gloved hand.”

One solitary, introductory sentence, and I was taken prisoner by the story.

Other writers followed in quick succession, like a riffling of falling dominoes: Isaac Asimov, Ray Bradbury, Arthur C. Clarke. But I didn’t limit myself to science fiction. Other titles that deeply impressed me early on, and which I have carried on my life’s journey, include: “The Yearling,” “Shane,” “Ivanhoe,” “Of Mice and Men,” “To Kill a Mockingbird,” and “The Good Earth” (recommended by a high school English teacher who told me, “You’ll dig ‘The Good Earth’!”).

It went on from there. I became that proverbial kid who, long after his parents tell him lights out, huddles under the covers with flashlight and book, his greatest fear one of being discovered and having his flashlight taken away. On reflection, I realize that my parents must have known I was defying them. But in their wisdom they feigned ignorance of my saintly sin of delight.

And so I owe my start as a reader to my parents, and to Edgar Allan Poe, and yes, in their rudimentary way, to the “Dick and Jane” books, whose counsel still whispers after all these years: Read, Robert. Read, read, read. 

And I have never stopped.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.