Why I’m totally into totality

Later this month, the path of a total solar eclipse will pass from Oregon to South Carolina.

Jon Olav Nesvold/NTB Scanpix/Reuters
A total solar eclipse is visible in Longyearbyen in Svalbard, Norway, March 20, 2015.

Do you know where you were Oct. 24, 1995? Or March 29, 2006? Right away, I do: India and Libya.

If you are a total solar eclipse chaser, you certainly recall where you were on those dates. And this year, Aug. 21 should be memorable: That’s when parts of the United States will experience a total solar eclipse.

Many have found it difficult to describe a total solar eclipse. I have seen countless beautiful eclipse photographs, but no photo would have ever persuaded me that I must see one in person.

What sparked my obsession with totality was something I read many years ago: A professional astronomer described his first trip into the moon’s shadow, going into great detail about his preparations to witness a total eclipse. 

When the moment came, however, he took not a single photo or measurement. He was simply unprepared for the spectacle of totality. I was captivated by his account. If a professional astronomer could be so overcome, then I had to see one.

A total eclipse is more than visual; one is immersed in the sounds of it as well. I don’t mean you can hear the eclipse, but when I show a video of an eclipse and the audience sees people of all ages screaming and yelling, jumping up and down, or perhaps just sitting in stunned silence with tears running down their cheeks, the sounds are what seem to captivate everyone. At the end of totality, with the moon creeping away from the sun’s disk, I heard a little girl say, “I don’t want it to be shiny again!” Me, neither. This is what “hearing” an eclipse is all about.

It was no different for me in Aruba on Feb. 26, 1998. It was so cloudy that it was difficult to keep our cameras aligned with the sun. We had nearly given up hope when, with just minutes to spare, the sky cleared and a black hole surrounded by a shimmering halo appeared in the sky.

My son had accompanied me to report back to his friends about this “eclipse thing” his mother was always talking about. His friends wanted a second opinion – thinking perhaps I was too excitable to give an accurate account. It couldn’t be that incredible, they wondered – could it? (I had shown them some pictures. They’d expressed mild appreciation.)

After the eclipse, my son didn’t have much to say, perhaps feeling that he would be preaching to the converted. But a few days later we watched the video he had shot during totality. The eclipsed sun moved in and out of the frame as the camera swung wildly about. His excitement was palpable. When totality began, he exclaimed, “What is that? What is happening?” Maybe his mom wasn’t crazy after all.

So what about Aug. 21? That’s when the 70-mile-wide path of totality will stretch from Oregon to South Carolina. The “total” part will last about two minutes at each location.

There hasn’t been a total solar eclipse in the contiguous United States since 1979, and that one only passed over a bit of Washington and Montana. There hasn’t been a total eclipse where I live in Arizona for more than a thousand years! 

This time, all of North America will see at least a partial eclipse, but you’ll have to travel into the path of totality to see the big show. And take it from one who has witnessed a few eclipses: If a partial solar eclipse rates a 3 on a scale of 1 to 10, a total eclipse is a million.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why I’m totally into totality
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today