Hither, thither, and everywhither?

The Elizabethans had more options for adverbs of place than we have today; are we missing anything?

Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP
Passengers wait on the platform before boarding a train at the U Street Metro Station in Washington on March 12, 2015.

“Whither adverbs of place?” the American Heritage Dictionary (AHD) blog wondered not long ago. 

We seem not to have quite as rich and nuanced a set of adverbial options nowadays as the Elizabethans, for example, did. As the blog reminds us, we have here, there, and where. But each of these is one of a set of verbal triplets, and the records of the other members of this extended family are mixed. To convey the idea of “to this place” as distinct from “in this place,” people used to say “hither” instead of simply “here.” Thither and whither expressed similar distinctions involving “that place” or “which place,” respectively.

Thus: “Come hither,” “Go thither,” and “Whither goest thou?” (Back when these words were common, thou was, too.) 

In the other direction were hence, thence, and whence, for “from this place,” “from that place,” and “from which place,” respectively. And where are they all today? As the AHD blog notes, “[H]ence still sees frequent service as an adverb, though nowadays we use it more to mean “for that reason” rather than “from this place.” 

Thence lives on in the language of surveying, platting, and public records (“running thence along the boundary line between...”). Whence shows up in reference to origins: “Remember from whence you came,” the headline on a CNN commentary admonished Irish-Americans on the eve of this past St. Patrick’s Day. Note, though, the redundant “from” – it’s built into whence.

Hither lives on in the racy-sounding idiom “come-hither look,” which shows that even adverbs have to worry about typecasting. 

Thither seems to have withered; a quick Google News check shows it appearing in historical reprints of 19th-century articles in local newspapers, plus occasional instances of the idiomatic “hither, thither, and yon.” 

Of these underemployed adverbs of place, the one with perhaps the most illustrious post-Elizabethan career is whither, which lives on in what I’ll call the “journalistic whither.”

It’s a shorthand used to ask, What’s up with x, and where (whither?) is it going? It tends to show up in verbless headlines over stories with a subject that is often not quite top of mind. That’s different from a story giving the latest on a subject people are already following.

Thus the recent “Whither the Muslim World’s NATO?” It helps to come to a story like this with some advance knowledge that the Muslim world has a NATO – and that the West has one, too, for that matter.

Thus, “Whither Metro?” on possible changes to Washington’s transit system; “Whither Silver?” on a commodities-news site; even “Whither cashew?” on India’s potential as a nut producer. 

My favorite, though, was over a piece on Westernizing young people in Yerevan, Armenia, opting for nose jobs: “With Rhinoplasty on the Rise, Whither the Armenian Nose?” 

I don’t want to dither further about hither or thither. But whither has found a niche. And the Armenian headline got it on the nose.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Hither, thither, and everywhither?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today