Yes, you can grow roses

When it comes to maintenance, new shrub varieties are practically care-free.

Lynn Hunt
Pink and red knock out shrub roses.

After I give a presentation on the Queen of Flowers, people often approach me to say they can’t grow roses. When we chat about their experiences, I almost always discover they’ve planted an unsuitable or inferior bush. As rose newbies, they don’t realize that some varieties that thrive in California can’t take the heat of the South. Others that do well in Texas may not survive New England winters. And dime-store roses, their canes dipped in wax, will struggle to grow anywhere.

Try again, I say, with virtually mistake-proof shrub roses. Shrubs are easy to care for, will grow well in most areas of the United States, and – most important – don’t need to be coddled. 

The “shrub” classification can be confusing, as it lumps many kinds of roses into one category. Traditionally, shrubs were known for their longevity, hardiness, and flower power. Now that modern breeders have added disease resistance to the list of attributes, shrubs are even more desirable. 

The legendary French rose hybridizer House of Meilland was one of the first to combine beauty with low maintenance. The firm that gave the world the Peace rose introduced the Bonica shrub rose in 1985. It’s easy to grow and ideal for beginners.

Bonica sports masses of ruffled pink blooms all season long and can spread to five feet in width, making it a great choice for a low hedge. It was the first shrub rose to win the All-America Rose Selection Award. 

As Bonica was redefining the shrub rose, Englishman David Austin was creating a “new” old-fashioned rose. His English beauties combine the fragrance and charm of old garden roses grown prior to 1867 with modern vigor and repeat bloom. Deep-crimson Munstead Wood won the fragrance award at last year’s Biltmore International Rose Trials and is continually covered with flowers in my garden.

Other highly rated recent shrub introductions include Lyda Rose, a charming vigorous bush with blooms that resemble apple blossoms. It is disease-resistant and can tolerate some shade.

The 1991 rugosa rose Linda Campbell features brilliant, clear red blooms with as many as 25 blossoms per stem. Growing to a statuesque six feet, it’s a perfect showoff in the garden.

It was the introduction of the Knock Out line of roses that allowed gardeners to use the words “care-free” and “rose” in the same sentence. Virtually impervious to disease, they are truly “plant and forget.” Gardeners who shied away from roses in the past love Knock Outs. But don’t limit yourself to just that variety.

American Rose Society horticultural judge Bill Blevins reminds us not to overlook older species of roses such as Rosa rugosa alba (single white blooms) and rubra (mauve pink with yellow stamens). “They bloom all season,” he says, “even in windy coastal areas, and are almost never troubled by disease. And they’re covered with beautiful red hips [fruits] in the fall.”

Mr. Blevins also recommends a newer shrub rose, Belinda’s Dream (pink), which has received the Earth-Kind designation for disease resistance. Earth-Kind cultivars have gone through rigorous, pesticide-free field trials and promise outstanding performance with minimal care. More than 20 varieties, including the shrub Sea Foam, have earned the designation.

Another favorite is Roseraie de l’Haÿ, introduced in 1901, a vigorous shrub with crimson-purple flowers and disease-resistant, apple-green foliage. It grows to seven feet by seven feet, and the strong perfume of its blossoms draws admirers.

Many of the roses described here can be found at local garden centers and nurseries. Others can be ordered online.

All are good choices for wannabe gardeners or those who want to enjoy the charm of roses without any hassles. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.