Is 'DWTS' trying to draw young viewers by adding Brittany from 'Glee'?

'Glee' star Heather Morris will compete on the upcoming season of ABC's 'Dancing With the Stars.' 'DWTS' does far better with total viewers than it does with bringing in viewers ages 18-49. 

Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP/File
Heather Morris, best known as Brittany from 'Glee,' arrives at the Los Angeles premiere of 'War Dogs' at the TCL Chinese Theatre on Aug. 15, 2016.

Another “Glee” star, Heather Morris, has joined the cast of the ABC reality competition “Dancing With the Stars” in what may be an attempt to draw younger viewers, as the show succeeds with drawing viewers overall but struggles to bring in those under 50. 

Ms. Morris, who starred as Brittany S. Pierce on the Fox musical hit “Glee,” is one of the celebrity cast members who have joined the season 24 cast of “Dancing.” She will compete with dancer Maksim Chmerkovskiy.

In addition, Olympic gymnast Simone Biles will dance with Sasha Farber, professional bull rider Bonner Bolton will dance with Sharna Burgess, singer Charo will dance with Keo Motsepe, reality star Erika Jayne will dance with Gleb Savchenko, football player Rashad Jennings will dance with Emma Slater, comedian Chris Kattan will dance with Witney Carson, Olympic ice skater Nancy Kerrigan will dance with Artem Chigvintsev, Nick Viall of “The Bachelor” will dance with Peta Murgatroyd, actor Mr. T will dance with Kym Johnson, Fifth Harmony singer Normani Kordei will dance with Val Chmerkovskiy, and baseball player David Ross will dance with Lindsay Arnold. 

Morris is the latest “Glee” star to appear on “DWTS,” as co-star Amber Riley (who played Mercedes Jones) won the competition in 2013, and “Glee” actor Riker Lynch (who played Jeff, one of the Warblers) appeared on the show in 2015. 

Bringing on the actress could be an attempt to bring in younger viewers to “DWTS,” as in its heyday, “Glee” was a hit with young watchers, which is a demographic valued by advertisers.

However, the show later fell in the ratings among younger and total viewers, with a February 2015 episode bringing in the least amount of viewers 18-49 of any major broadcast network show in that time slot. 

Why the push for younger viewers? In the 2015-2016 season, "DWTS" succeeded with older viewers but struggled with those 18-49, with the program ranked number eight for the season among total viewers but coming in at number 42 for viewers 18-49. 

But bringing in "Glee" stars may not be enough to draw younger viewers, who may have different priorities for their entertainment options. According to a 2016 study by the company Defy Media, consumers 13-24 watched more than 12 hours of video a week on YouTube, social media, and other free online services and almost 9 hours weekly on Netflix or other online services that charge. Meanwhile, they spent a little more than 8 hours on television.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.