Who should replace Jon Stewart? Twitter knows.

When Jon Stewart leaves, social media has some intriguing ideas about who should take over on The Daily Show.

Brad Barket/AP Photo/File
This Nov. 30, 2011 file photo shows television host Jon Stewart during a taping of "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart" in New York. Comedy Central announced Tuesday, Feb. 10, 2015, that Stewart will will leave "The Daily Show" later this year.

It’s official: After 16 years on the air, comedian Jon Stewart is leaving Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show.”

"Through his unique voice and vision, 'The Daily Show' has become a cultural touchstone for millions of fans and an unparalleled platform for political comedy that will endure for years to come," Comedy Central President Michele Ganeless said of Mr. Stewart in a statement.

The announcement stunned American viewers, many of whom have come to trust Stewart’s satirical newscast more than more serious sources, according to Forbes. In fact, a case could be made that Stewart is this generation's Walter Cronkite, who left the CBS anchor desk in 1981. 

But as the public comes to accept Stewart’s inevitable departure, the question that looms: Who will replace him?

True to form, people took to Twitter with their suggestions – and the candidates range from the good, to the bad, to the downright absurd.

One idea is to get someone who has both experience in news reporting and now has time on his hands:

Another is that The Daily Show's  current correspondents deserve a chance to shine.

Also among the most likely nominees are the established comedians.

There were those with more outlandish ideas, such as characters who don’t actually exist. After all, who better to do fake news than fake people (or aliens)?

Others thought only of themselves.

In the end, there were those who held on to the idea that no one could truly replace Jon Stewart... except, perhaps, Jon Stewart.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.