Julianne Hough is returning to 'Dancing With the Stars' as a judge

Julianne Hough will be joining the judging panel of 'Dancing With the Stars' for the upcoming season. 'I won't be mean or malicious,' Julianne Hough said of her judging stint. 'That's not who I am.'

Mario Anzuoni/Reuters
Julianne Hough will serve as a judge on 'Dancing With the Stars.'

"Dancing With the Stars" says two-time champion Julianne Hough is returning to the ballroom as a judge this season. She will preside alongside Len Goodman, Carrie Ann Inaba, and Bruno Tonioli.

After serving as a company dancer-choreographer, Hough left the show in 2009 to focus on acting and music. “My role is to encourage and be supportive, and to also be candid and honest and try not to beat around the bush, to be too politically correct," Hough said of her duties as a judge in an interview with People. "I want to give critiques so they can improve. I'm not there to be harsh or cause a controversy. I won't be mean or malicious. That's not who I am. That's not my role at all.”

Of the fact that she’ll be judging her brother Derek, who serves as the professional dancer half of a competing pair, she said, “Derek has been known to be very good with his partnerships. But it's not about my brother, nor is it about [fellow professional dancers] Cheryl [Burke] or Mark [Ballas]. It's about the partnership and the celebrity who is dancing.”

"Dancing With the Stars" is hosted by Tom Bergeron and Erin Andrews. Its new season launches Sept. 15 on ABC.

“Stars” debuted in 2005 and has well-known people team up with professional dancers. Hough had won the competition previously with Olympic athlete Apolo Anton Ohno and with Helio Castroneves, a race car driver. She had also paired with comedian Adam Carolla, Cody Linley of the TV series “Hannah Montana,” and country singer Chuck Wicks.

After Hough departed “Dancing,” she starred in such movies as the 2011 remake of the film "Footloose," the 2012 film “Rock of Ages,” which was based on the Broadway musical of the same name, and the 2013 movie “Safe Haven.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.