What is the Taylor Swift Award? Singer receives prize at 2016 BMI Pop Awards

Swift was honored with the Taylor Swift Award at this year's ceremony as well as receiving other prizes such as the pop songwriter of the year award.

Lucas Jackson/Reuters
Taylor Swift arrives at the Metropolitan Museum of Art Costume Institute Gala in 2016.

And the Taylor Swift Award goes to ... Taylor Swift.

At this year's BMI Pop Awards in Beverly Hills, Calif., the Taylor Swift Award went to the singer herself. The prize is the second time Broadcast Music, Inc. has given an award named after a musician in its 63 years, with the first being Michael Jackson in 1990. 

Broadcast Music, Inc. is in charge of royalties for publishers and writers in the music business. The awards ceremony bestows prizes on the songwriters and music publishers whose tracks have been performed the most times during the previous year. 

BMI vice-president Barbara Cane said of Swift's prize, "She has had a profound impact, not only musically, but also through her personal conviction and commitment to create a standard that values and respects music for everyone. We felt it appropriate to award Taylor with an [honor] that is as unique and special as she is." 

In addition to the Taylor Swift Award, Swift also received the pop songwriter of the year award. Meanwhile, the Mark Ronson and Bruno Mars song "Uptown Funk" was named the pop song of the year and the BMI Icon Award went to Cynthia Weil and Barry Mann, who together penned songs such as "You’ve Lost That Lovin' Feeling." 

Swift co-wrote all the songs on her most recent album, 2014's "1989," which included such hits as "Shake It Off," "Blank Space," and "Bad Blood."

The singer has received praise for her songwriting in the past, with Jon Caramanica of the New York Times writing that "1989" has "expertly constructed" songs. Alexis Petridis of The Guardian wrote of the album, "As a songwriter, Swift has a keen grasp both of her audience and of pop history." However, not all critics have embraced her transition from country to pop music as Boston Globe writer James Reed found "1989" to be a move in the wrong direction, writing of the work, "The songwriting feels generic, a departure from the personable details that have made her a unique voice."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.