‘Nomadland’ director brings her vision to Marvel’s ‘Eternals’

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )
Marvel Studios/AP
Actor Gemma Chan (left) and director Chloé Zhao on the set of "Eternals." Ms. Zhao's previous film "Nomadland" won Oscars for both best picture and director.

The director of “Eternals,” the new Marvel extravaganza, is none other than Chloé Zhao, the indie auteur whose last film was the microbudgeted “Nomadland.” The road movie about rural itinerants won Oscars for both best picture and director, and for star Frances McDormand. In style and substance, I can’t think of two more disparate films. Unlike some of my colleagues, however, I don’t regard Zhao’s Marvel makeover as a simple case of selling out. But before I elaborate on that, here’s a more pressing question: Is the film any good? 

I’m not a big Marvel person, but I recognize the need for these films to exist; they’re the cinematic equivalent of the circus coming to town. A few of them, such as “Iron Man,” “Black Panther,” and “Avengers: Endgame,” were good. “Eternals” is subpar in comparison. It comes across like the B side to the “Avengers” movies, with almost none of their star power or CGI pizazz.

The Eternals are shadow warriors sent to Earth thousands of years ago to save it from the monstrous Deviants, who resemble befanged supersize renegades from “A Quiet Place.” Thanks to the Eternals, earthlings have never heard of Deviants but, alas, they’ve returned – after 500 years – more ferocious than ever. 

Why We Wrote This

If Oscar winner Chloé Zhao pivots from her indie roots to make a big-budget Marvel film like “Eternals,” does it make her a sellout? The Monitor’s film critic weighs in on that – and the new movie.

The Eternals include Sersi (Gemma Chan), first seen in modern-day London and looking happily human paired with her earthly lover (Kit Harington). Her Eternals lover, Ikaris (Richard Madden), with whom she has had an off-and-on romance for millennia, suddenly shows up to complicate matters. He and the other superheroes, scattered around the globe in their various guises, are roused to once again decimate the Deviants.

Marvel Studios-Disney/AP
The diverse cast of immortals in “Eternals” includes (from left to right) Kumail Nanjiani, Lia McHugh, Gemma Chan, Richard Madden, Angelina Jolie, and Don Lee.

It’s noteworthy that the Eternals are, by Hollywood superhero standards, remarkably diverse, with several other Asian actors besides Chan – including Don Lee’s rollicky Gilgamesh and Kumail Nanjiani’s wisecracking Bollywood heartthrob Kingo – in starring roles. Brian Tyree Henry’s genius inventor Phastos not only is an openly gay Black man but also is married and a father. Lauren Ridloff, who is deaf, plays the deaf speedster Makkari.

But, except for Angelina Jolie, who plays the warrior Thena, none of the film’s performers is especially luminescent. Even Jolie, in her too-brief role, seems a bit distracted. She periodically goes murderously rogue against her helpmates, which turns out to be more tiresome than thrilling. Even if Zhao and her co-screenwriters were more adept at establishing the family-style togetherness of the Eternals, the emotional continuity is shattered by the incessant time tripping and globe hopping. Just when you think you’ve got your bearings in South Dakota, you suddenly find yourself in Mesopotamia. 

Still, I don’t think Zhao should be chided for attempting a film so seemingly outside her comfort zone. (She has professed a love of manga.) No director – least of all a female director, for whom job opportunities are particularly unplentiful – should have to commit to a career of specialization. The only qualm I have about “Eternals” is that it’s not better. (And, for the record, I was mixed on “Nomadland” and her earlier indies.)

Is Zhao perhaps the victim of a double standard? There was no big selling-out hoo-ha when Ryan Coogler, who made his name with the powerful indie “Fruitvale Station,” graduated to “Creed” and “Black Panther.” The combined budgets of Christopher Nolan’s first two films, “Following” and “Memento,” wouldn’t pay for the caterer on his “Batman Begins.”

It’s also quite possible to achieve moments of emotional intensity in superhero movies matching anything in the indie realm. Case in point: Tony Stark’s death scene in “Avengers: Endgame,” which features Robert Downey Jr. at his most moving. In an ideal world, I would wish for filmmakers to mix it up micro and macro, the way, say, Steven Soderbergh does. But that’s just me. If indie filmmakers want to exit the byways and enter the circus tent, there will be others to take their place. In the end, the only thing that really matters is that the movies be good.

Peter Rainer is the Monitor’s film critic. “Eternals” is rated PG-13 for fantasy violence and action, some language, and brief sexuality.

 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.