Tonal shifts in 'The Sisters Brothers' seem like the result of indecision

The cast, which includes John C. Reilly, Joaquin Phoenix, Riz Ahmed, and Jake Gyllenhaal, is strong and demonstrates yet again how good acting can carry audiences through movies that otherwise would not be worth the trip.

Magali Bragard/Annapurna Pictures
Joaquin Phoenix (left) stars as “Charlie Sisters” and John C. Reilly (right) stars as “Eli Sisters” in Jacques Audiard’s THE SISTERS BROTHERS, an Annapurna Pictures release.

Alternately smart-alecky and elegiac, “The Sisters Brothers” is one of those revisionist westerns that oftentimes makes me hanker for the unrevisionist real deal. John C. Reilly is Eli Sisters, who, with his hothead brother Charlie, played by Joaquin Phoenix, are mid-19th-century hired guns in Oregon/California Gold Rush country. Their employer, forbiddingly referred to as The Commodore (Rutger Hauer in a don’t-blink-or-you’ll-miss-him cameo), wants the brothers to hunt down and kill Hermann Kermit Warm (Riz Ahmed), a softspoken utopian idealist who has invented a chemical formula for locating gold in riverbeds. In equal pursuit is John Morris (Jake Gyllenhaal), who, like the brothers, decides to team up with Hermann rather than knock him off.

Director Jacques Audiard, who co-wrote the script with Thomas Bidegain based on the novel by Patrick deWitt, can’t decide on what tone to take, so he throws in a bit of everything: funny, loopy, scary, serioso, slapstick, realist, surrealist. In theory, I’m not opposed to such a mélange; life isn’t all one tone, why should a movie be? Some fascinating westerns, such as the underrated “The Missouri Breaks,” have been cinematic crazy quilts. But the tonal shifts in “The Sisters Brothers” seem more like the result of indecision than design. Audiard, in his first American movie, pays court to the absurdist, picaresque hijinks of the Coen brothers and Quentin Tarantino, but it all seems secondhand. The cast is strong, though, and demonstrates yet again how good acting can carry audiences through movies that otherwise would not be worth the trip. Grade: B- (Rated R for violence including disturbing images, language, and some sexual content.) 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Tonal shifts in 'The Sisters Brothers' seem like the result of indecision
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today