Sweet 'Christopher Robin' has impressive voice work

( PG ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

The film takes a while to get going.

Laurie Sparham/Disney/AP
'Christopher Robin' stars (from l.) Bronte Carmichael, Ewan McGregor and Hayley Atwell.

“Christopher Robin" has the misfortune to come out the same year as “Paddington 2,” one of the best stuffed animal movies ever made. It takes awhile to get going but, still, it’s rather sweet. Ewan McGregor plays the grown-up Christopher Robin of A.A. Milne’s “Winnie-the-Pooh” books fame. Christopher grew up in the Hundred Acre Wood with his loquacious stuffed animal friends but has moved into uneasy adulthood in London, working a drudge job as efficiency manager for a luggage factory and skimping on quality time with his exasperated wife (Hayley Atwell) and daughter (Bronte Carmichael). Circumstances bring him back to the Wood, where he reconnects with his buddies, at first grudgingly but then wholeheartedly, as they accompany him back to London and redirect his life into a newfound happiness.

The voice work of the animals is more impressive than the CGI effects that bring them to life – all the more reason to enjoy Brad Garrett’s gloomy donkey Eeyore, Jim Cummings' fetchingly befuddled Winnie the Pooh, and Toby Jones’s occasionally wise Owl. Marc Forster, who directed from a script by Alex Ross Perry, Tom McCarthy, and Allison Schroeder, doesn’t have an especially fanciful imagination, but he keeps things moving along at a fairly brisk pace. The film’s message is that there is more to life than balloons and honey, but you could have fooled me. Grade: B (Rated PG for some action.)

[Editor's note: The review originally did not list two of the credited screenwriters for the movie "Christopher Robin."]

 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.