'Trophy' explores moral intertwining of hunting and conservationism

( Unrated ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

The documentary, which is directed by Shaul Schwarz and Christina Clusiau, is riddled with ambiguities.

“Trophy” is a documentary that can make the stomach turn and the head spin. It’s about the big-stakes world of hunting and conservationism, and what’s surprising is how morally intertwined the two activities are.

The first scene in the movie shows a rhinoceros being shot with a tranquilizer gun and then having its horn sheared off. It turns out that the horn, which can be sold for a fortune on the open market, was removed by the team at Buffalo Dream Ranch in South Africa in order to render the rhino worthless to poachers. John Hume, the owner of the ranch, which is home to 1,500 rhinos, builds himself up as a savior of endangered species – rhinos numbered 500,000 in the early part of the 20th century and count for about 30,000 at the end of 2015. But, as conservationists angrily argue later in the film, Hume is no saint: He makes many millions from the horns he shears.

The entire film, directed by Shaul Schwarz and Christina Clusiau, is riddled with similar ambiguities. We discover near the end of the film that Chris Moore, who claims to protect elephants against poachers in Zimbabwe, is also working with hunters. His rationale, that “poachers would shoot every last one” if not for his intervention, doesn’t ring false, exactly. But it does ring hollow. Grade: B+ (This movie is not rated.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Trophy' explores moral intertwining of hunting and conservationism
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today