The story of 'Wind River' is swallowed up by outlandish plot devices

'Hell or High Water' writer Taylor Sheridan has a strong feel for the agitations and ennui brought about by life in wide-open spaces.

Courtesy of The Weinstein Company
Jeremy Renner stars in ‘Wind River.’

Taylor Sheridan, the celebrated writer-director of “Wind River,” has a strong feel for the agitations and ennui brought about by life in wide-open spaces. He also has a gift for dialogue that is laconic without seeming lazy. These talents were paramount in his script for “Hell or High Water,” probably the best-written movie of 2016.

“Wind River” starts out on the same high plane. Cory Lambert (Jeremy Renner), a hunter who works for the wildlife office in a remote area of Wyoming that encompasses a poverty-stricken Native American reservation, discovers the dead body of a young girl in the snow, barefoot, bloodied, and sexually violated. In attempting to solve the crime, local authorities bring in an unseasoned FBI agent, Jane Banner (Elizabeth Olsen), who joins the far more experienced Cory to track the killer.

The film is gracefully directed around the edges, but the core story, a kind of existential murder mystery, is swallowed up by a series of increasingly outlandish plot devices involving drug runners and Tarantino-esque shootouts. Olsen does as best she can with a perplexing part – why would she arrive in this freezing hinterland so ill-equipped with even the basics of survival? – while Renner, more somber and indrawn than usual, seems geared up for a better movie than the one he’s in. As the father of the murdered girl, Gil Birmingham, who was so good in “Hell or High Water” as Jeff Bridges’s lawman partner, is equally fine here. Grade: C+ (Rated R for strong violence, a rape, disturbing images, and language.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to The story of 'Wind River' is swallowed up by outlandish plot devices
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2017/0804/The-story-of-Wind-River-is-swallowed-up-by-outlandish-plot-devices
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe