'Icarus' should delve more into motivations of Russian Olympians

( Unrated ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

The film follows the odyssey of Dr. Grigory Rodchenkov, the director of Russia’s Anti-Doping Center, who, under the guise of testing Russia’s Olympians for illegal usage, was actually gaming the system.

Courtesy of Netflix
A still from the movie ‘Icarus.’

Bryan Fogel’s documentary “Icarus” begins as a Morgan Spurlock-like jape in which Fogel, an amateur bicyclist, attempts to reproduce the self-administered steroid use that the pre-discredited Lance Armstrong employed to become a perennial Tour de France champion. Thankfully, the film moves into more interesting terrain as it follows the odyssey of Dr. Grigory Rodchenkov, the director of Russia’s Anti-Doping Center, who, under the guise of testing Russia’s Olympians for illegal usage, was actually gaming the system by tampering with steroid-infested urine samples. As the 2016 Summer Games in Rio de Janeiro approached, he decides to tell all to The New York Times, forcing him to separate from his family and go into hiding.

Fogel had intimate access to Rodchenkov during this period, and the good/bad doctor emerges as both tortured and bumptious. One aspect of this story that could have been more deeply underscored: The steroid use that ultimately banned so many Russian Olympians was not just about winning. It was about winning under threat of disgrace or death. The smiles bestowed by Vladimir Putin on the Russian winners at the 2014 Winter Olympics at Sochi are laced with poison. Grade: B (This movie is not rated.) 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Icarus' should delve more into motivations of Russian Olympians
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Movies/2017/0804/Icarus-should-delve-more-into-motivations-of-Russian-Olympians
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe