'Land of Mine' shows when mercy must overrule hatred

'Mine' star Roland Møller is powerful as a Danish sergeant living in the aftermath of World War II. The film is the Danish entry for the foreign language Oscar.

Courtesy of Camilla Hjelm Knudsen/Sony Pictures Classics
Louis Hofmann appears in 'Land of Mine.'

“Land of Mine,” the excellent Danish entry for the foreign language Oscar, is set in the immediate aftermath of World War II, when the wounds of that war are still very much open. After suffering through five years of Nazi occupation, the Danes in this film, who reside on the country’s west coast, are vehemently anti-German. 

In the first scene, Danish Sgt. Carl Leopold Rasmussen (the powerful Roland Møller) notices a retreating German POW brandishing a bloody Danish flag as a souvenir and descends upon him in a homicidal rage. This is the same sergeant who will soon be charged with supervising a band of much younger German POWs, practically all of them in their teens, to dismantle some 45,000 land mines out of the several million the Germans buried on the west coast in anticipation of an Allied invasion.

The boys are members of the Volkssturm, a German national militia that was created near the war’s end when able-bodied older men were no longer available. It soon becomes clear that these boys, clueless in the ways of war, were used as chattel. This is not to say that the Danes hold any sympathy for them. The officer (Mikkel Boe Følsgaard) who initially corrals them and trains them in bomb dismantlement tells them not to indulge in self-pity. “Denmark is not your friend,” he says. “No one wants to see you here.”

It’s clear from the way writer-director Martin Zandvliet sets up the story that the fiery Rasmussen, who denies the boys adequate rations and pens them indoors at night, will eventually soften. It’s to the film’s credit that he does so in ways that are eminently believable. He comes to realize, as we do, that these soldiers are also casualties of war. Zandvliet makes it easy for us to feel this way, since he doesn’t have any of the boys talk about politics or Nazism. This may be a bit of a cheat, since surely there must have been among them a few who championed the Nazi cause or had relatives who did. If this sort of thing had been in the movie, it would have complicated Zandvliet’s humanist agenda but made for a more complex experience.

Instead, he focuses on a few of the boys – the angry Helmut (Joel Basman), the optimistic Wilhelm (Leon Seidel), the fearful identical twins Ernst and Werner (Emil and Oskar Belton), and Sebastian (Louis Hofmann), the oldest in the group of 20 or so and the one to whom Rasmussen feels closest. Rasmussen has told them that once the mines are dismantled, they can return home, and it is this promise that the boys cling to. But because they are so ill-equipped for this dangerous work, it’s inevitable that their numbers will become decimated. When the twins talk longingly about how they will return to Berlin and become bricklayers, we sense, as we are meant to, what is in store for them.

“Land of Mine” doesn’t quite encompass the dizzying contradictions of war. Those millions of mines were, after all, planted by the Germans, so who better to dismantle them? Nevertheless, in the film’s view, innocent boys were forced to be the dismantlers, and, for Zandvliet, this constitutes a kind of war crime. (If the film were about seasoned soldiers defusing the bombs, the movie would be considerably less affecting.) By having Rasmussen, portrayed as the fiercest of German haters, ultimately sympathize with the boys, the film is demonstrating that, at least in this instance, mercy must overrule hatred. Grade: B+ (Rated R for violence, some grisly images, and language.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Land of Mine' shows when mercy must overrule hatred
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today