Director Curtis Hanson won over audiences, critics with noir 'L.A. Confidential'

What impressed critics about the film 'Confidential'? Hanson also directed projects such as '8 Mile,' 'The Wonder Boys,' and 'Too Big to Fail.'

Hanson's 1997 film 'L.A. Confidential' was nominated for nine academy awards.

Director Curtis Hanson of the movie “L.A. Confidential,” among other work, has died. 

Mr. Hanson also helmed movies including “8 Mile,” “The Wonder Boys,” and the TV film “Too Big to Fail.” 

“Confidential” was nominated for the Best Picture Oscar and Hanson was nominated for best director for his work on the film. He and writer Brian Helgeland received best adapted screenplay Oscars for their work on the movie.

What made “Confidential,” which was also a box office hit, a success? 

Critics hailed the 1997 movie, which was based on the book of the same name by James Ellroy, as a new, great example of a genre that has often captivated reviewers and audiences: the L.A. noir.

New York Times writer Janet Maslin referenced one of the genre’s most acclaimed movies in reviewing “Confidential.” 

“Without strain or affectation, ‘L.A. Confidential’ recalls ‘Chinatown’ in drawing an entire socioecomic cross-section and elaborate web of corruption out of an investigation that starts small,” Ms. Maslin wrote.

Monitor staff wrote at the time of the movie’s release that some of the movie’s success comes from its cast, writing, “The story is so complicated that the movie can't quite make it clear, but the picture has impressive energy and high-intensity performances from Kevin Spacey, Danny DeVito, Russell Crowe, and Guy Pearce.” 

The film also co-starred Kim Basinger, James Cromwell, and David Strathairn.

Maslin also praised the way the movie kept the audience on its toes. 

“[The film] embroils [the characters] in a cliché-free, vigorously surprising tale,” Maslin wrote of the film. She also felt that the movie didn’t talk down to viewers. “…[The film] revels in its endless complications,” Maslin wrote. “Take a popcorn break and you'll be sorry.… Late in 'L.A. Confidential,' in a scene for which viewers will be endlessly grateful, a character being interrogated finally gives a brief synopsis of the plot. That's no easy matter.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.