Is the Cannes Film Festival adapting to the current movie industry?

The 2016 Cannes Film Festival begins on May 11, with movies including selections from Amazon, Steven Spielberg's 'The BFG' and Pedro Almodóvar's 'Julieta.'

Eric Gaillard/Reuters
'Cafe Society' stars Kristen Stewart (l.) and Blake Lively (r.) as well as director Woody Allen (center) attend the 2016 Cannes Film Festival.

The 2016 Cannes Film Festival begins today, with movies being screened at the festival including "Money Monster," "Personal Shopper," and "Loving." 

The movie opening the festival is director Woody Allen's movie "Café Society," which stars Kristen Stewart and Jesse Eisenberg. Ms. Stewart is starring in another anticipated movie at the festival, "Shopper," as well. 

Also appearing at the festival will be director Steven Spielberg's Roald Dahl movie "The BFG"; the comedy "The Nice Guys," which stars Russell Crowe and Ryan Gosling; "Julieta," which is directed by Pedro Almodóvar; and director Asghar Farhadi's film "The Salesman."

This year, many movies' release plans now include On Demand or streaming options, front and center today with Mr. Allen's film "Café Society" backed by distributor Amazon – the first time one of its movies has opened Cannes.

The prestigious festival may be willing to embrace Amazon because of the directors working for the service, according to film journalist Dana Harris. 

"Cannes' dedicated focus on auteurs can make it oddly adaptable," Ms. Harris writes for Variety. "While the industry debates what Netflix and Amazon will mean for the landscape, Cannes just wants what it wants. This year, that means five productions from Amazon, which is making its festival debut. The company’s newness as a distributor is irrelevant to Cannes; what matters is that the films are all from auteurs," including Allen; Park Chan-wook of "The Handmaiden"; and Jim Jarmusch, who helmed both "Gimme Danger" and "Paterson."

Cannes may have also welcomed Amazon, according to The Hollywood Reporter's Scott Roxborough, because the streaming service is so far more in line with how the industry has always done things compared to, say, Netflix. Netflix’s 2015 film "Beasts of No Nation" skipped Cannes and was screened at the Venice Film Festival and the Toronto International Film Festival, among others. Ted Sarandos, Netflix chief content officer, later told the Hollywood Reporter, "We are releasing a slate of films. It’s not a festival strategy, it’s not an awards strategy. Some of the movies in that slate are awards-driven and festival-friendly films, but it’s definitely not the driver of what we’re doing ... We didn’t really target any films for Cannes, so it’s not like we had some organized effort to be in Cannes that didn’t work out, or that we were blockaded in any way."

Earlier this year, Amazon executives at CinemaCon told those at the event that their movies will be released first in theaters, a contrast to Netflix's plans. Multiple theater chains refused to screen "Beasts" in 2015 after Netflix decided to have the film debut in movie theaters and online the same day. 

"There is no suspicion about [their] love of cinema. They are good for cinema," festival director Thierry Fremaux told The Hollywood Reporter. "Amazon and the people in charge of cinema at Amazon – the people who bought Woody Allen and Nicolas Winding Refn – they are movie buffs." 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.