'Freeheld' is ponderous but Michael Shannon is a standout

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

Shannon gives a performance of great subtlety and depth as a police officer whose longtime partner, Laurel Hester (Julianne Moore), tries to sign over her pension benefits to her much younger life partner.

Phil Caruso/Toronto International Film Festival/AP
Julianne Moore, as Laurel Hester, and Ellen Page as Stacie Andree, in a scene from the film, 'Freeheld,' directed by Peter Sollett.

“Freeheld” is certainly timely, though, given its ponderous approach, less than invigorating. Based on Cynthia Wade’s Oscar-winning documentary of the same name, it’s about real-life New Jersey detective Laurel Hester (Julianne Moore), a 23-year veteran of the force, who is diagnosed with late-stage lung cancer and in 2002 attempts to sign over her pension benefits to her much younger life partner, Stacie Andree (Ellen Page), despite the near-total resistance of the state’s county legislature (whose members are known as freeholders). 

The early scenes, when Laurel and Stacie first meet and court, are charming, and the performers' contrapuntal acting styles here  – Moore is wary and borderline abrasive, Page open-hearted and blunt – ring true. But when the diagnosis arrives, all the predictable buttons are pushed and righteousness reigns. Director Peter Sollett, whose debut feature, “Raising Victor Vargas,” was such a loose-limbed wonder, takes no chances here. The screenwriter, Ron Nyswaner, essentially recaps his problem-picture dramaturgy from “Philadelphia,” only less successfully. Steve Carrel shows up in a cameo as LGBT activist Steven Goldstein, a self-proclaimed “big loud gay Jew,” and, as discordant as his performance is, he’s a welcome relief from all the puffed-up posturing. 

I must single out Michael Shannon from the general run of mediocrity.  As Laurel’s long-time police partner, Dane Wells, he gives a performance of great subtlety and depth. Dane is a straight-arrow type whose growing solicitude for Laurel and her predicament is entirely believable and without a trace of cant. Shannon is one of our best actors and makes every movie he appears in, including this one, worth a look. Grade: C+ (Rated PG-13 for some thematic elements, language and sexuality.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.