'After Earth' finds its heroes battling against an awkward screenplay

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

'After Earth' is directed by M. Night Shyamalan and takes itself too seriously. 'After Earth' stars Will Smith as a fierce father and his real-life son Jaden as his cadet son.

Claudette Barius/Sony – Columbia Pictures/AP
'After Earth' stars Jaden Smith.

Will Smith plays an interplanetary ranger in M. Night Shyamalan’s dreary “After Earth,” which is set a thousand years in the future, although it all seemed too drearily present-day to me. The gimmick here is that Smith’s son is played by Jaden Smith, his actual son.

Smith’s ranger is a martinet ranger whose cadet son desperately wants to live up to his father’s impossibly high standards. He gets the chance when their spaceship crash-lands on the planet Earth, which humans were forced to evacuate a thousand years earlier due to a global cataclysm. The boy, in order to rescue his dad and himself – the vessel’s sole survivors – faces off against everything from neo-condors to gloppy monsters. (Not withstanding the movie's misleading ads, Jaden has far more screen time than Will.)

But his fiercest adversary is the screenplay. Replete with howlers, it had the audience I saw the film with in titters from very early on. Jaden Smith was a good little actor in “The Pursuit of Happyness,” in which he also costarred, to much better effect, with his father. Will Smith’s patriarch never cracks a smile. That’s how you know he’s serious. But it’s impossible to take this movie seriously, certainly not as seriously as it takes itself. Grade: C- (Rated PG-13 for sci-fi action violence and some disturbing images.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.