'The Reluctant Fundamentalist' has a great cast and timely story

'Reluctant' is occasionally too touchy-feely, but the cast, including Kiefer Sutherland and Liev Schreiber, are all good.

Dario Cantatore/Invision/AP
'The Reluctant Fundamentalist' stars Kiefer Sutherland.

Timeliness is certainly on the side of Mira Nair’s uneven but fascinating “The Reluctant Fundamentalist.”

Adapted from the 2007 novel by Mohsin Hamid, it’s about a Pakistani man, aptly named Changez (Riz Ahmed), who leaves his native Lahore to seek the American dream, first at Princeton University and then at a high-powered corporate consulting firm in New York.

When the twin towers are struck, he finds himself clouded by hostility and alienated from his adopted homeland because of his South Asian appearance.

Much of the film is recounted in flashbacks from Lahore in 2011, where Changez has ultimately resettled to become a fiery political professor.

Is he also associated with terrorists?

Bobby (Liev Schreiber), an American journalist who appears to be more than a journalist, wants to know, and their outdoor cafe contretemps is the film’s framing device. Nair has a marvelous eye for utilizing real-life locations for dramatic effect. She makes Changez’s upsets palpable.

The film’s weakness is that too often, especially at the end, it opts for a liberal humanism that seems too touchy-feely for the anguish on the screen.

But the actors, including Kiefer Sutherland as the corporate boss, Kate Hudson as Changez’s sort-of girlfriend, and the great Om Puri as Changez’s poet father, are all seamlessly good.

They know that something vital is at stake in this film.

Grade: B+ (Rated R for language, some violence, and brief sexuality.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.