'Arthur Newman' has a dreary plot despite its star leads

The plot of 'Arthur Newman' – loners embark on an odyssey full of life lessons – seems to be more interesting to filmmakers than audiences.

Evan Agostini/Invision/AP
'Arthur Newman' stars Colin Firth (l.) and Emily Blunt (r.).

Colin Firth and Emily Blunt are two of the most attractive performers in movies, so the prospect of seeing them teamed in “Arthur Newman” was promising.

Alas, it’s a dreary road movie about two loners who, you know, bond over life’s mishaps.

Firth’s Wallace Avery is divorced, estranged from his teenage son, and on the outs in his work (it’s not clear what he does).

His solution: Walk away from his old life and assume a new identity as one Arthur Newman, bound for Terre Haute, Ind., and a possible job as a country club golf pro.

En route he meets “Mike” (Blunt), a kleptomaniac with commitment issues, at a seedy motel.

They embark on one of those maundering, life-lessony odysseys that filmmakers love but audiences rarely do.

The film, directed by Dante Ariola and written by Becky Johnston, asks the question: Is it possible to truly start life all over again? “Arthur Newman” might have been better if it had not started at all.

Grade: C- (Rated R for sexual content, language and brief drug use.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.