The Eye of the Storm: movie review

Actors Geoffrey Rush and Judy Davis hold the screen with their craftsmanship, but the film is lackluster.

Amanda Schwab/Starpix/AP
Director Fred Schepisi (l.) with the film's actors Alexandra Schepisi (center) and Geoffrey Rush (r.).

Fred Schepisi, one of the world’s great directors (“The Chant of Jimmie Blacksmith,” “A Cry in the Dark”) is working at half-speed in “The Eye of the Storm,” a convoluted family drama derived from a Patrick White novel.

Charlotte Rampling plays an Australian matriarch whose extended swan song is stirring up the anxieties of her backbiting brood, a London-based actor played by Geoffrey Rush, and his Europe-wandering sister, played by Judy Davis. Rush and Davis are two of the best actors in the business, and their brittle gamesmanship and rue holds the screen. But the film is disappointingly lackluster – a mild squall instead of a storm. Grade: B- (Unrated.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.