Dark Shadows: movie review (+trailer)

( PG-13 ) ( Monitor Movie Guide )

Most of 'Dark Shadows' is not quite scary and not very funny.

Peter Mountain/Warner Bros./AP
Any humor in 'Dark Shadows' comes from vampire Barnabas (Johnny Depp) encountering the 1970s.

Dark Shadows” is the eighth pairing of director Tim Burton and Johnny Depp, and the bloom, if not quite off the rose, is fading fast. Taking off from the cult-fave TV soap that ran from 1966 to 1971, the movie isn’t bad, exactly, just blah. The coming attractions set me up for a satirical goof, but, as it turns out, that trailer is misleading. Most of the film is a not-quite-scary and not-all-that-funny mélange.

Depp plays Barnabas Collins, master of Collinswood Mansion in seaside Maine, to which he returns after being transformed into a vampire and buried alive by the vengeful witch Angelique (Eva Green) back in the halcyon days of 1795. The current Collinswood clan, circa 1972, is led by matriarch Elizabeth (Michelle Pfeiffer) and includes a resident child psychiatrist (Helena Bonham Carter) with ginger hair and the pallid skin that is standard in all Burton movies. Barnabas, with his fangs and eye shadow, fits right in.

The film is best when it focuses on Barnabas’s culture shocks in this brave new world. Depp has fun with the character’s bafflements without camping it up. What’s missing overall is the sense of fun Burton once evinced in films like “Beetlejuice.” Or, if not that, then more of the doomy grandeur of, say, “Batman.” The middle road of “Dark Shadows” leads nowhere. Grade: C+ (Rated PG-13 for comic horror violence, sexual content, some drug use, language and smoking.)

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.