The role of ‘you’re welcome’ in polite society

What “you’re welcome” means is less important than what it does. Even small favors can create a feeling of obligation on the part of the recipient.

Staff

What do you say in response to “Thank you”? For many Americans, the default is “You’re welcome.” I had never thought much about this common exchange until a reader wrote suggesting the reply was worth investigating.

On a literal level, it is hard to pinpoint exactly what it means. What is going on when one person says “Thank you for driving me home” and her friend replies “You’re welcome”? Welcome to what?  

Welcome derives from the Old English wilcuma, a noun meaning “a desired guest.” It acquired some of its more familiar senses in the Middle Ages, when it was used as an adjective meaning “agreeable, pleasing” (“His gift was welcome,” circa 1300) or “cordially invited to do something” (“You should be welcome to go home with me,” circa 1400).  

In the 15th century, “and welcome” began to be tacked onto the end of invitations to suggest that a person was freely permitted or warmly invited to do or have something: “Here are some cakes; ... take ’em, and welcome.” In these cases, the phrase seems almost to be a preempting of thanks, an answer to the recipient’s gratitude before he or she has even had a chance to express it. 

The first citation of “you’re welcome” in the Oxford English Dictionary dates from 1907, but others have argued that it can be found as far back as 1603, in “Othello.” These citations are few and far between, however, because this familiar phrase is an example of what linguists call phatic speech, language used for social purposes rather than to convey information. It is a stock phrase that greases the social wheels, and as such is frequently used in conversation but rarely recorded in printed material. 

When we say things like “please,” “thank you,” and “you’re welcome,” we are communicating that we know and are abiding by the rules of politeness in English-speaking American society. What “you’re welcome” means is less important than what it does – it is a “minimizer.” Even small favors can create a feeling of obligation on the part of the recipient, as English recognizes by having “much obliged” as another way to say “thank you.” Our stock responses to such expressions of gratitude minimize this sense of indebtedness: “no problem,” “my pleasure,” and “you’re welcome.”

Now, though, “you’re welcome” seems to be losing its minimizing role. A 2015 New York Times article calls the phrase “a gloat,” and many online commentators agree that it sounds arrogant, implying that the thanks is deserved. For these speakers, instead of playing down the recipient’s obligation, “you’re welcome” emphasizes it. Unless, that is, it is used jokingly – for example, when you post a picture of your cat doing something cute and tag it “You’re welcome!”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.