After last night's debate, which candidate would you eat a burger with?

Foreign policy and tax cuts aside, would you rather grab a hamburger with Barack Obama or Mitt Romney? New survey results tell all.

Gerald Herbert/AP/File
President Barack Obama orders a fast food hamburger in Washington, May 29, 2009.
Courtesy of Smashburger
An All-American Smashburger. The Smashburger restaurant sponsored a recent poll that revealed a majority of its respondents favored having a burger meal with President Obama over Gov. Mitt Romney.

The presidential debate on foreign policy held last night in Boca Raton, Fla., has been largely declared a tie. In other words, no glaring gaffes, a congeniality that was missing from the second debate, and well articulated debate agendas. There's nothing like a good race that comes down to a dead-heat tie on the homestretch. So for the undecideds in this country, who will surely once again decide the 2012 election, set aside your comparative analysis for a moment and ask yourself this question: Which candidate would you rather have a hamburger with?

A recent survey conducted by Harris Interactive on behalf of Smashburger, a "better burger" restaurant, polled 2,094 US adults and found that nearly 3 in 5, or 59 percent, would most like to eat a hamburger with President Barack Obama.

We can assume that vegetarians were automatically disqualified from the poll, or perhaps they politely hung up on the pollster. And we'll try not to deduce that Mitt Romney's choice of a veggie burger before the last debate had any bearings on the results of this hamburger poll.

More scrutiny of the results reveals that of the 59 percent who favor sharing a meal with President Obama:

  • 64 percent hail from the Midwest, 55 percent from the South, 61 percent from the Northeast and 59 percent from the West. 
  • Younger adults chose President Obama over their older counterparts, 64 percent of 18-to-34 year olds vs. 54 percent of those 55 years and older. 
  • 66 percent of women 18 to 34 years old and 45 to 54 years old, respectively, would most want to have a hamburger with President Obama over 51 percent of women ages 55 and older. 

Two in 5, or 41 percent, want to grab a burger with Governor Mitt Romney.

  • Of the 41 percent36 percent are from the Midwest, 45 percent from the South, 39 percent from the Northeast and 41 percent from the West. 
  • 46 percent of adults 55 and older selected presidential candidate Governor Romney over 36 percent of younger adults ages 18 to 34. 
  • Similarly, 49 percent of women 55 and older most want to have a hamburger with presidential candidate Governor Romney over 34 percent of women 18 to 34 years old and 45 to 54 year olds, respectively. 

The survey also found that Bill Clinton is the former US President Americans would most want to have a hamburger with, at 22 percent. Other desirable burger buddies from the past include Abraham Lincoln (15 percent), John F. Kennedy (14 percent), Ronald Reagan (14 percent), Thomas Jefferson (5 percent), George Washington (5 percent), and Theodore Roosevelt (5 percent), George W. Bush (4 percent) and Jimmy Carter (4 percent).

What does this hamburger poll reveal about America's next president? Absolutely nothing. But it tells you that President Obama is the preferred date for women voters at the local burger bar.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to After last night's debate, which candidate would you eat a burger with?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today