Family Guy: Brian dies, world grieves, coping skills fail

When Fox killed off Family Guy's Brian character, American viewers took to social media to grieve and protest. Were these adult viewers so sheltered as kids that they never developed coping skills?

Family Guy: Brian, the beloved, talking family dog's death on Sunday shocked viewers. As the world grieves for Family Guy's Brian, one blogger wonders, 'what happened to everyone's coping skills?'

Since cartoons have evolved to become more adult-oriented it’s no surprise that grownups suffering the shock at the loss of "Family Guy" dog Brian, but seeing how badly adults are coping with the imaginary loss, parents may want to reconsider the decision to shelter kids from reality so they can grow up to cope with cartoons.

Social media exploded with outrage and grief of adults over the loss of the martini-swilling, snarky canine character Brian Griffin.  Brian is voiced by series creator Seth MacFarlane who decided to kill off the beloved character to “shake things up,” according to the Daily News.

“By mid-day Monday, a petition had popped up on calling for Brian to be brought back to life. Launched by “Family Guy” fan Aaron Thompson of Tuscaloosa, Ala., it had more than 1,500 signatures,” according to the Daily News.

I wonder what this says about the social and emotional maturity level of our current society and how much helicopter parenting had to do with it.

There seems to be a fairly evident lack of coping skills present in this situation, as evidenced by the following Tweet from Tom Lewis @sonic2457.

Other outraged viewers wanting a death do-over rallied under the Twitter hashtag #BringBrianBack.  

Tori Nelson @VRae593 posted on Twitter: 

Adam Lucidi @adamlucidi posted:

We complain that our kids grow up too fast by watching cartoons but, as evidenced by the response to "Family Guy," that’s not looking like the case.

Seeing how many people are handling the loss of Brian I wonder if we shouldn’t really start mourning the loss of our children’s adulthood.

Is this happening because, as children, these viewers were so helicopter parented that they can’t get off the kid ground as adults?

As parents can we be so bent on protecting our kids from grief and reality that we do too good a job?

The viewers who are beyond consolation never had a pet die because they all went to the imaginary “farm” some parents use as a euphemism for when Sparky got hit by a car.

Kids need to be set to launch from the cartoon strip to the real world.

My mom and her generation were never protected from pet demise and neither was I.

When the bunny ate the plastic flowers in the centerpiece at Easter and died, the facts were never hidden or soft-pedaled.

This was largely because I needed to learn how to keep the next pet alive.

The cat died, the dog died, Old Yeller was put down, and generations grew to maturity to one day watch the news and documentaries instead of being so deeply invested in cartoons.

While the content of cartoons has become more mature, it’s not rubbing off on kids, teens, and young adults in a helpful way.

With all the violence of cartoons the characters pop back to life and kids never get the concept of death in reality. By further sheltering them from death of people and pets we may not be helping them separate fact from fiction and diminishing their coping skills in the process.

Watch cartoons with the kids, watch Family Guy and Adult Swim on your own, but balance the kids’ experiences with enough reality to make the transition from being a child to adulthood an actual change of emotional and social pace.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Family Guy: Brian dies, world grieves, coping skills fail
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today