Should parents be allowed to bring children to the office?

Many organizations now allow new parents to bring their babies into the workplace, supporters of this trend cite it as the most progressive healthy maternity policies to date.

Tony Avelar/The Christian Science Monitor
A pilot program in Washington state is allowing parents to bring babies, aged six weeks to six months, to work.

A growing office trend that allows parents to bring their newborns to work expanded recently with a new policy at two Washington state agencies.

The Washington state Department of Health and the Washington Traffic Safety Commission are allowing parents to bring their babies to work until they turn six months old, following the enactment of a new “Infant-at-Work” policy.

Communications consultant for Washington Traffic Safety Commission Erica Stineman says the arrangement has been ideal for her so far. Stineman brings her four-month-old daughter, Lydia, into the office three days a week. "It was really exciting to know that I wasn't going to have to be bringing her to day care after eight weeks of being on maternity leave," Stineman told ABC News. "Having this extra time with her just meant the world to me." 

While many companies have set up child care facilities at work for many years now, bringing a baby into the office is an emerging trend that raises concerns about employee productivity and distractions for colleagues.

However, companies that allow babies in the office cite many benefits.

“In a lot of ways it’s helped productivity,” Chris Madill, the Washington Traffic Safety Commission deputy director said. “Morale is high and it’s been a good thing for our office.”

While this trend is mainly geared towards parental well-being and critical bonding between mother and infant, companies cite mutual benefits for the employer and employee.

The Washington state Department of Health said, “the agency expects the Infant-at-Work policy to help increase employee morale, lower turnover costs due to higher retention rates, and reduce overall health care costs for babies due to easy-access breastfeeding.”

The Nevada State Health Division first piloted their “bring your infant to work” in 2009 and reaped benefits from the program, including, “greater employer appreciation and loyalty, lower healthcare costs, higher breastfeeding rates, and families reporting greater financial stability.”  

But how practical is bringing a baby to the office? “After the initial novelty wears off, babies become a fixture in the office and are not seen as a distraction," The Association of State and Territorial Health Officials observed in its research on Nevada’s program.

About 200 organizations and companies in the United States now have “infant at work” policy, according to the Parenting in the Workplace Institute.

Child care has emerged as an important issue for both employers and employees in recent decades. A study by the US Department of Labor observed that, during that period,

"America has become a society in which everyone is expected to work – including women with young children. But many of society's institutions were designed during an era of male breadwinners and female homemakers. What is needed is a … reform of the institutions and policies that govern the workplace to ensure that women can participate fully in the economy and that men and women have the time and resources to invest in their children."

According American Health Public Association says 45 percent of the workforce is female,  but 22 percent of women don’t return to work after their first baby is born.

The program attempts to address the current workplace mismatch by allowing for an easier transition back into work for the mother, according to the association. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.