Olympic moms: 13 mothers compete for Team USA

The “Celebrating Moms” series of commercials by Proctor & Gamble during Olympic coverage is a tear-jerking ode to sacrifices mothers make to support their kids’ athletic careers. But what about athletes who are mothers, themselves?

Elite athlete moms have the same run-of-the-mill work/life balance as the rest of us. But these 13 Olympic moms do put parenting – both its challenges and rewards – in a new perspective.

10. Danielle Scott-Arruda – Volleyball

Ivan Alvarado/Reuters
Danielle Scott-Arruda, left, and Megan Hodge celebrate with other members of their team after winning their women's Group B volleyball match against Brazil at the London 2012 Olympic Games on July 30, 2012.

Danielle Scott-Arruda is competing in her fifth Olympic Games, the first U.S. volleyball player (woman or man) to do so. But her career almost ended when she gave birth to daughter Julianne in 2010 because she doubted that she would be able compete at the same level again.

"I think having and wanting my daughter at that time ... I wasn't worried if I could still play after having her, but wondered if I could come back at a high level,” Ms. Scott-Arruda told the Long Beach (Calif.) Press-Telegram. "The idea of her seeing me play has been a motivation for me."

So far in the 2012 London Olympics, the US women's volleyball team is proving that Scott-Arruda is competing at that level – and higher. They will play Korea in the semifinals match on Aug. 9.

In Beijing in 2008, Ms. Scott-Arruda scored 85 points, helping the team win a silver medal, the US women’s first medal since 1992. The team missed medaling in Athens (fifth), Sydney (fourth), and Atlanta (seventh). In 1996, Scott-Aruda was the youngest member of the team, but had the most kills in their final match against Germany.

Scott-Arruda was a three-time All-American volleyball player at Long Beach State University, leading the team to a national title in 1993 and being named the national player of the year. She holds the school’s records for blocks (604) and hit percentage (.421), and had 1,778 career kills. For the national team, she helped win the world championship in 1994, place second in 2002, and fourth in both 2006 and 2010.

10 of 13

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.