Robert Plant and David Crosby: Focused on the far horizon

(Helle Arensbak /Ritzau Scanpix via AP)
Robert Plant and The Sensational Space Shifters perform at Arena at Roskilde Festival Thursday, July 4, 2019.

Dear Reader,

In his 2005 song “Tin Pan Valley,” Robert Plant sang, “My peers may flirt with cabaret/some fake the ‘rebel yell’/Me — I’m moving up to higher ground….”

A handful of elder statesmen, like Mr. Plant, are still inspiring us with vital and surprising work. What can we learn from the likes of Jeff Beck, Judy Dyble, John Hiatt, Paul Simon, and the late David Bowie? Sometimes I get to ask them.

David Crosby partly attributes his creative rebirth to working with new collaborators.

“They're young writers and excited with life,” he told me during a recent conversation with the Monitor. “They widened my world.”

When I interviewed Mr. Plant, he explained why he’d rather create exciting new music than reunite Led Zeppelin. “An old pal of mine said, ‘Hey, Robert, why do you keep turning your back on the obvious?’” Mr. Plant said. “Because I really love music. I don’t like repetition and tedium.” 

Phrased differently, artists should avoid comfort zones. A creative rut may mean one is stuck in old ways of thinking. 

Steven Wilson, a British progressive rock artist, has a theory about why some older artists lose their edge.
 
“I believe that curiosity is the most underrated and undervalued human attribute,” he told me. “Curiosity is that admission to yourself that there’s something you don’t know and you don’t understand, but you would like to know more about it. The majority of people, when they grow up, associate that with being a kid and [think] they should somehow be above that.”

Mr. Wilson’s final advice? “Stay in touch with your inner child.”

 
Stephen Humphries, Culture writer

Please share our newsletter! New subscribers can sign up here.
For a student subscription to The Monitor visit: csmonitor.com/student.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.