Golden Globes: What wins for 'The Revenant,' 'The Martian' could mean for Oscars season

'The Revenant' won the best drama award at the Golden Globes, while 'The Martian' took the best comedy or musical prize. The victories mean two very different films are now an important part of the awards season race.

Courtesy Twentieth Century Fox/AP
'The Revenant' stars Leonardo DiCaprio.

The film “The Revenant” won the Golden Globe award for best dramatic movie, a victory that many industry watchers found surprising. 

Those behind the Golden Globes, the Hollywood Foreign Press Association, split the biggest movie prize into two categories: best comedy or musical and best drama. While some nominees in the best comedy or musical prize, such as this year’s winner, “The Martian,” can be thought of as contenders for the Best Picture Oscar as well, the best drama prize is often watched closely as a possible indicator for what’s in the lead when it comes to the Oscars race. 

While “Revenant” was considered a fairly sure thing for a Best Picture nod, many had thought the movie “Spotlight,” which stars Michael Keaton and Rachel McAdams, was the best bet for the Golden Globe best drama prize and that nominees like “Room” and “Carol” were also strong contenders.

Instead, “Revenant” taking the prize and “Revenant” director Alejandro González Iñárritu winning the best director award means that an Iñárritu film may be in the lead for the Oscar Best Picture prize for the second year in a row. (Mr. Iñárritu’s movie “Birdman” won Best Picture last year and Iñárritu won the best director award.) 

Meanwhile, the comedy or musical award went to the film “The Martian.” Some found it baffling that “Martian” was in the category at all, considering the movie isn’t exactly a laugh-a-minute film despite the many wisecracks of the protagonist portrayed by Matt Damon. But “Martian” taking the comedy or musical prize will no doubt increase its chances of scoring a nod for the Oscar Best Picture.

What do these two movies, both of which had their Oscars chances strengthened by their Golden Globe wins, have in common? Both have been movies that have attracted audience interest. “Martian,” which tells the fictional tale of Mark Watney, an astronaut who becomes stranded on Mars, became one of the highest-grossing movies of 2015. “Revenant,” which depicts the true story of a man named Hugh Glass (Leonardo DiCaprio) who is wounded by a bear in the wilderness, opened in limited release at the end of 2015 and just expanded this past weekend. But its early numbers already showed that audiences would turn up ­and when it expanded this past weekend, it scored impressive box office numbers, coming in second for the weekend behind only “Star Wars: The Force Awakens.” 

But “Martian” is a crowd-pleasing film suitable for most ages (those old enough to hear protagonist Mark’s language, anyway) with a hopeful message about humanity, as Mark’s co-workers band together to get him home, with some taking personal risks to do so. 

“Revenant,” by contrast, is an incredibly violent film that many critics have said can be difficult to watch. Plot points involve the treachery of protagonist Hugh’s companions, one suggesting they murder the wounded Hugh because he is delaying them, and Hugh seeking revenge on those who betrayed him. 

The Academy has selected both feel-good tales and darker stories as Best Picture in the past. We’ll see as awards season goes on which the Academy will favor this year.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.