'Sisters': Tina Fey and Amy Poehler's upcoming movie and the state of women in film comedy

'Sisters' stars Fey and Poehler as siblings who decide to throw a party.

John Shearer/Invision/AP
Tina Fey (l.) and Amy Poehler (r.) arrive at the 2014 Golden Globe Awards.

The upcoming movie “Sisters,” which opens later this month, brings actresses Tina Fey and Amy Poehler back together onscreen. 

“Sisters” stars Ms. Fey and Ms. Poehler as siblings who decide to have a party at their parents’ house before their childhood home is sold. It co-stars Ike Barinholtz, Maya Rudolph, and John Leguizamo, among many others. 

The movie is coming out as the amount of comedy films with women starring continues to spark conversation. 

“Bridesmaids,” a comedy starring Kristen Wiig, Melissa McCarthy, and Ms. Rudolph, among others, became a huge box office hit when it was released in 2011, and the two “Pitch Perfect” movies, comedies which center on a female a capella group, became hits. This summer, Amy Schumer scored a hit with the film “Trainwreck,” and McCarthy continues to be at the center of comedies, including this summer’s “Spy,” while Reese Witherspoon and Sofia Vergara headed up this summer’s “Hot Pursuit.” It was noted at the time that this past summer had an unusually high number of comedies starring women – perhaps the results of what was dubbed "the 'Bridesmaids' effect" (after all, it takes time to produce movies in Hollywood.)

The role of women in Hollywood in general continues to make headlines, with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission recently speaking with female directors to attempt to discern if discrimination is occurring. Meanwhile, actress Jennifer Lawrence recently wrote a letter about how actresses’ wages compare to actors’ and a study found that only 12 percent of the 100 top-grossing movies released in 2014 had a female protagonist. 

And in comedy films, women aren’t always in the spotlight. The early 2000s comedy movie genre was dominated by what critics dubbed the “frat pack,” a group that included Ben Stiller, Will Ferrell, Luke Wilson, Jack Black, Steve Carell, Vince Vaughn, and Owen Wilson. Women like Meg Ryan and Drew Barrymore starred in romantic comedies, but that was of course alongside male co-stars.

Male stars at "Saturday Night Live," Fey and Poehler's former home, have starred in successful movies based on "SNL" characters like "The Blues Brothers" and "Wayne's World." Those behind "SNL" had previously attempted to transfer characters played by "SNL" actresses to the big screen with projects like "It's Pat" and "Superstar," but these haven't succeeded to the same extent. 

If “Sisters” becomes a box office hit, the movie could inspire imitators, and the upcoming, all-female “Ghostbusters” film, will no doubt have an effect on the industry as well if it dominates financially. The fact that Fey, Poehler, and McCarthy are consistently appearing as the stars of movies will no doubt inspire more projects.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.