Why did 'Our Brand Is Crisis,' 'Burnt' flop at the box office?

For the second weekend in a row, new movies didn't hit at the box office, with new releases 'Brand' and 'Burnt' grossing far less than holdovers like 'The Martian' and 'Goosebumps.' Why didn't these movies find an audience?

Alex Bailey/The Weinstein Company/AP
'Burnt' stars Bradley Cooper.

The end of October brought another underwhelming weekend for new releases at the box office, with new films like “Burnt” and “Our Brand Is Crisis” performing poorly this past weekend.

The new movie “Burnt,” which stars Bradley Cooper as a chef, grossed only $5 million this past weekend, coming in fifth at the domestic box office.

“Our Brand Is Crisis,” which stars Sandra Bullock as a political consultant who travels to Bolivia to work on a presidential campaign, grossed even less this past weekend, taking in only $3.4 million. By way of comparison, it grossed less than “The Last Witch Hunter,” which opened last weekend and was viewed as performing poorly.

The lack of returns from these new movies meant films that opened earlier this month were still ruling the box office. “The Martian,” which opened in early October, grossed more than $11 million this past weekend, to come in at first place, while the kids’ book series adaptation “Goosebumps” came in second, grossing more than $10 million. Steven Spielberg’s Cold War drama “Bridge of Spies” came in third, grossing more than $8 million, followed by the spooky animated movie “Hotel Transylvania 2,” which grossed more than $5 million and came in fourth.

What was behind the underwhelming performance of “Our Brand” and “Burnt”? Both received negative reviews, so the star power of Cooper and Bullock were possibly not enough to draw moviegoers. In addition, Halloween celebrations this year most likely happened on Friday and Saturday night, since the holiday fell on a Saturday, leaving many potential moviegoers were otherwise engaged. And neither "Brand" nor "Burnt" is a Halloween-themed movie, so it wouldn't have been a festive option if people wanted to head to the multiplex. 

In addition, “The Martian” and “Goosebumps” simply may have had a wider audience appeal. “Burnt” and “Brand” are both movies aimed at an adult audience and are marketed around the performance of their leads rather than big special effects or any literary source material. “The Martian” is a crowd-pleaser, with its inspiring narrative and the special effects used to create the many space- and Mars-set scenes. Meanwhile, “Goosebumps” is a family movie that can prompt nostalgia from a Millennial audience and has a simple and entertaining enough concept (scary creatures from books coming to life) that the film can also bring in families unfamiliar with the books. 

If “Burnt” or “Brand” had gotten positive reviews, they could have drawn older moviegoers looking for a quieter movie than “The  Martian.”

But Spielberg’s “Bridge,” which doesn’t have the big effects or well-known story of such previous movies of his as “Lincon” or “War Horse,” was aiming for the same audience and since “Bridge” was better received critically, these moviegoers most likely headed for Spielberg’s movie rather than either of this weekend’s new releases.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to Why did 'Our Brand Is Crisis,' 'Burnt' flop at the box office?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today