'Zoolander 2': Here's how the film could find success

The new 'Zoolander' film is set to be released this February and reportedly reunites stars Ben Stiller and Owen Wilson, who appeared in the first movie. 

Greg Allen/Invision/AP
'Zoolander' stars Ben Stiller.

Work on the sequel to the 2001 comedy “Zoolander” continues to move forward and the film is set to be released this February.

The 2001 film “Zoolander” stars Ben Stiller as Derek Zoolander, a model who finds himself involved in a strange conspiracy. It also features such comedy stars as Owen Wilson and Will Ferrell, and while it did not perform overly well at the box office and received a mixed reception from critics, it has become a cult favorite since its release. Stiller and Wilson took to the runway in Paris this past March and Stiller mentioned a sequel on social media soon after. Ferrell stated in an interview that his character, Mugatu, is in the new movie.

“Zoolander” is often counted as one of the comedies that stars what critics have dubbed “the frat pack,” a group that includes Stiller, Wilson, Ferrell, Vince Vaughn, Jack Black, Wilson’s brother Luke Wilson, and sometimes Steve Carell. However, recent movies on which the group has collaborated have received a middling reception. “Anchorman 2,” which starred Ferrell and Carell, did well in 2013. But the 2012 movie “The Watch,” which reunited Stiller and Vaughn, didn’t do well, nor did the 2013 movie “The Internship” with Vaughn and Owen Wilson.

However, the team behind the camera for the “Zoolander” sequel and its subject matter could signal success. Stiller is directing the movie and he co-wrote a script with Justin Theroux, a lineup that echoes that of the 2008 comedy “Tropic Thunder,” which Stiller directed and wrote with Theroux. “Tropic” starred Stiller, Black, Robert Downey Jr., Jay Baruchel, and Brandon T. Jackson and was a satire of Hollywood, complete with fake trailers before the film that poked fun at prevalent genres like Oscar prestige pic and crude comedy. The movie did fairly well with critics and at the box office.

The first movie “Zoolander” lampooned the modeling industry and it sounds like the new movie could be poking fun at our current culture as well. While the story could have changed since then, Stiller discussed the new movie's story in an interview some time ago, saying, “In the fashion world, if you go away for a year, it’s changed – it just happens so quickly. I think the idea in the beginning of the movie is that it’s 10 years later, and Derek and Hansel [Owen Wilson’s character] are literally forgotten. Nobody remembers who they are, so they have to reinvent themselves.” No doubt they'll reinvent themselves to match up with pop culture's current obsessions, giving Stiller and Theroux plenty of room to parody our world.

If the “Zoolander” sequel goes in this direction, reiterating themes Stiller and Theroux have successfully parodied before, the upcoming movie could find both critical and financial success. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.