What happened to the Power Rangers? Short film gives grim, gritty answer.

A new 14-minute short produced by Adi Shankar takes viewers to a post-apocalyptic world where the Machine Empire has taken over and the old gang has been disbanded and disillusioned. While it’s definitely not for kids, adult fans seem to love it.

What happens when a group of teenagers are trained to become soldiers and forced to fight in an intergalactic war they had nothing to do with?

Short answer: They get very messed up.

That’s the premise behind “Power/Rangers,” a short film by “Dredd” producer Adi Shankar and based on the popular 90s television series “Mighty Morphin Power Rangers.”

The film is set in a post-apocalyptic world controlled by the robot alien villains known as the Machine Empire, and centers on former Red Ranger Rocky DeSantos, played by “Dawson’s Creek” star James Van Der Beek.

Rocky, who now works for the Empire, has captured former Pink Ranger Kimberly Hart (played by Katee Sackhoff of “Battlestar Galactica”) as part of an effort to destroy the old team completely. The condensed plot reveals what happens to the rest of the team while getting in as much blood and violence as possible.

It has little to do with the kid-friendly original series, which featured costumed caperers and dinosaur robots – and that is exactly how director Joseph Kahn likes it.

In an interview with entertainment news site Hitfix, Mr. Kahn – the man behind such films as “Torque” and music videos like Taylor Swift’s “Blank Space” – bemoaned the movie industry’s failure to produce “dark” and “gritty” films in a way that would have any real impact.

“So when I did the dark and gritty version of this, I mean, we go full out,” he told Hitfix. “There's blood, there's brains, there's gunshots, there's sex, there's violence.”

“I mean, basically we made the version that Hollywood could never ever make,” he said.

For producer Adi Shankar, the film is more about making something he was genuinely interested in – pursuing an art – rather than pushing a backdoor pitch to a big franchise, he told innovation magazine Fast Company.

In fact, Mr. Shankar already has under his belt three bootleg and Internet-exclusive films based on copyrighted characters – “Judge Dredd: Superfiend,” “The Punisher: Dirty Laundry,” and “Venom: Truth in Journalism.”

According to Fast Company:

Shankar is aware that his tendency to make unofficial, bootleg versions of big-dollar properties could have negative consequences for him. (Though he also admits that, if Marvel did approach him about doing a Punisher Netflix series, he would take it.) But win or lose, his motivation for all of this is creative, not financial. All he really wants, he says, is the freedom to do Judge Dredd, or the Punisher, or Venom the way he wants to see them.

It only made sense to do one on the Power Rangers, a show he loved growing up, Shankar says in a video blog explaining his reasoning behind the short film.

“Power/Rangers, to the public’s nostalgic glee, is already making the rounds online.

The short film has also given audiences cause to think about the upcoming feature-length, live-action version of “Mighty Morphin Power Rangers” that studio Lionsgate plans to release in the summer of 2016 – the latest in a series of Hollywood-backed reboots. 

Will Shankar’s short film have any influence on the big-budget feature? Will other filmmakers attempt his devil-may-care style of making movies?

Who knows?

What we do know is that while “Power/Rangers” has been removed from Vimeo, the safe-for-work version can still be viewed on YouTube

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.