Katy Perry: Here are some of the best tweets about her Super Bowl halftime performance

Perry's halftime show included dancing sharks, palm trees, and a large animal statue. She performed with artists Lenny Kravitz and Missy Elliott.

David J. Phillip/AP
Katy Perry (center) performs at the 2015 Super Bowl halftime show.

This year’s Super Bowl was reportedly the most-tweeted-about ever, with more than 28 million tweets with the hashtag #SB49 being sent over the course of the night, according to Twitter. This beats last year’s total of more than 24 million.

And one of the chief topics of discussion on Twitter was singer Katy Perry’s halftime show. Perry performed during the break with artists Lenny Kravitz and Missy Elliott and her show included her perching on top of a huge animal statue, dancing with sharks and palm trees, and riding far above the crowd on a star-shaped structure. Song choices included “Roar,” “California Gurls,” “Firework,” and “I Kissed A Girl,” which Perry performed with Kravitz. Meanwhile, some of the songs selected by Elliott included “Work It” and “Get Ur Freak On.”

Lots of bright colors and over-the-top visuals were involved, and some Twitter users loved it, while others were less won over. However, it should surprise no one who saw the show that the shark dancers were one of the main topics of discussion.

CBC reporter Nick Purdon thought Perry’s show might improve the image of sharks.

Radio presenter Simon Clarke also admired the shark performers in Perry’s show. 

People Magazine editor Whitney Little noticed that the shark dancer on the left was performing a slightly different routine from the one on the right.

Meanwhile, user Kayla Bennett thought she could find an everyday use for the shark costumes.

Former NFL player Matthew A. Cherry pointed out how Perry’s “Firework” prop resembled another famous star.

Twitter user Honeyleen Novilla noticed that one of Perry's outfits bore a resemblance to a costume from the Will Ferrell comedy "Blades of Glory."

Washington Examiner writer Joseph Lawler pointed out that the people performing as trees in Perry’s show had one of the most difficult jobs.

And user Daniel Waits found that his normal vehicle looked a little sadder after the halftime performance.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.