'Toy Story 4': Is the new movie a good idea?

Pixar has stumbled with other sequels like 'Cars 2,' but the first three 'Toy Story' films were all huge successes, with 'Toy Story 3' earning a Best Picture Oscar nomination. Still, some fans are unhappy a new film in the series is being made.

The 'Toy Story' films feature the voices of Tom Hanks (r.), Tim Allen (center), and Joan Cusack (l.).

A fourth film in the PixarToy Story” series will reportedly be released in 2017. 

According to Deadline, John Lasseter, who directed “Toy Story” and its sequel, will helm the fourth film. Lee Unkrich directed the box office smash and critically acclaimed film “Toy Story 3,” and the story for the new film was created by Lasseter, Unkrich, “WALL-E” director Andrew Stanton, and “Up” director Pete Docter, according to Deadline. 

1999's “Toy Story 2” was Pixar’s only movie sequel until the third “Toy Story” film was released in 2010 (it was soon followed by “Cars 2” and the “Monsters, Inc.” sequel “Monsters University”), and it certainly seems like “Toy Story 3” would be tough to top – the film was the highest-grossing animated movie of all time until “Frozen” took its crown last year, and it was nominated for Best Picture, still a rarity for animated movies. It currently holds an extremely positive score of 92 out of 100 on the review aggregator website Metacritic.

Still, Pixar proved long ago they shouldn’t be counted out creatively – having an elderly man as the main character, as in the film "Up," or having long nonverbal stretches of movie like in "WALL-E" were certainly gambles, yet both movies were well-received. Though sequels such as “Cars 2” and “Monsters University” didn’t win over every reviewer (“Cars 2” is the worst-reviewed Pixar film with a Metacritic score of 57, while “Monsters University” has a Metacritic score of 65), by contrast, so far the “Toy Story” franchise has been wildly successful critically – “Toy Story 2” has a score of 88 to go with the 92 score of “Toy Story 3.” 

Some fans were excited about the news and took to Twitter to express their happiness.

But others were less than happy to hear that the studio would be going back to the world of Woody and Buzz Lightyear.

Lasseter addressed these concerns in an interview with the Los Angeles Times.

“A lot of people in the industry view us doing sequels as being for the business of it, but for us it's pure passion," he said. "We only make sequels when we have a story that's as good as or better than the original. We don't just, because of the success of a film, automatically say we're going to do a sequel and then figure out what we're going to do.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 'Toy Story 4': Is the new movie a good idea?
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today