'Chappie' trailer introduces viewers to a new friendly robot

'Chappie' is the newest directorial effort by 'District 9' and 'Elysium' director Neill Blomkamp.

A trailer for “Chappie,” the next film by director Neill Blomkamp, has been released.

Blomkamp directed the 2013 movie “Elysium” and the 2009 film “District 9,” among other work. 

In “Chappie,” “The Newsroom” actor Dev Patel’s character Deon has created the robot Chappie, “a machine that can think and feel.” He and his compatriots watch, delighted, as Chappie learns words and creates drawings. (He also enjoys opening cartons of milk and petting dogs.) “Anything you want to do in your life, you can do,” Patel’s character tells Chappie.

However, Hugh Jackman’s character, Vincent, isn’t sure Chappie’s a good idea. “The problem with artificial intelligence is it’s way too unpredictable,” he says, and calls for him to be “removed.”

Fragments of action scenes show that Chappie’s existence may not be an entirely peaceful one. However, he says, “I am consciousness. I am alive.” 

“District 9” and “Elysium” star Sharlto Copley plays Chappie through motion capture, and the movie also co-stars Sigourney Weaver.

The film is set to be released on March 6. 

Blomkamp told the website Collider that “Chappie” is “science fiction. It’s totally different to [‘District 9’ and ‘Elysium,’] but it has funny elements to it.”

Jackman called the script for the movie “very, very, very good… very interesting” in an interview with Entertainment Weekly.

“It’s going to surprise people in a lot of ways,” he said of the film. “[Blomkamp] is a real visionary.” 

Blomkamp’s film “District 9” was nominated for the 2010 Best Picture award, and Monitor film critic Peter Rainer gave the film a B+, calling it “highly creative and amusing… in patches.” He was less won over by “Elysium,” which Rainer gave a C+.

“The garbage-y set pieces on Earth have a fetid monumentality, and [protagonist] Max [played by Matt Damon]’s desperation is sometimes stirring,” Rainer wrote. “But Blomkamp overdoes even his best effects.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.