Tom Hanks will reportedly star in a Steven Spielberg-directed Cold War drama

Tom Hanks will reportedly star as real-life U.S. Attorney James Donovan, who negotiated the release of an American pilot captured by the Soviet Union, in a movie directed by Steven Spielberg. Tom Hanks recently starred in the film 'Saving Mr. Banks.'

Jonathan Short/Invision/AP
Tom Hanks will reportedly star in a movie that will be directed by Steven Spielberg and is set during the Cold War.

We’re closing in on two years from when the last Steven Spielberg-directed movie (the Oscar-winner Lincoln) hit theaters. Since then, the filmmaker has been linked to a couple projects (RobopocalypseGods and Kings) that have since either been put on the back burner or fallen into development hell. Recently, the word’s been that Spielberg will next direct a currently-untitled Cold War drama, followed by a live-action movie based on Roald Dahl’s The BFG; we can confirm the news, as these films now have official release dates.

Spielberg’s E.T. screenwriter Melissa Mathison was hired a few years ago to adapt The BFG – Dahl’s book about the young orphan Sophie, who befriends the whimsical, dream-delivering, Big Friendly Giant, BFG for short. As for Spielberg’s Cold War drama, the script by Matt Charman tells the true story U.S. attorney James Donovan, who negotiated the release of an American pilot captured by the Soviet Union during the Cold War; we learned that Chapman’s screenplay has been revised by the Oscar-winning Coen Brothers.

Previously, it was indicated that it’s Spielberg’s intention to shoot his Cold War drama (starring Tom Hanks as Mr. Donovan) in the months ahead, before he starts production on the more effects-heavy BFG adaptation in 2015. We can now confirm that will happen, as Walt Disney Pictures – which is co-backing the dual DreamWorks’ projects – has announced that Spielberg’s latest period drama/thriller will hit theaters on October 16th, 2015, followed by The BFG some 8-9 months later on July 1st, 2016.

The combination of Spielberg, Coen Brothers, Hanks, and historical subject matter with relevant political overtones, makes this Cold War project sound rather intriguing; no wonder, then, it’s been positioned as a prospective awards season contender. As it stands, Spielberg’s drama will only have opening weekend competition in Guillermo del Toro’s haunted house film throwback,Crimson Peak; we expect that the two movies will be able to coexist in peace, as far as box office goes.

BFG currently has opening weekend competition from the Angry Birds animated feature,Independence Day 2 and the Tarzan reboot by director David Yates (Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 & 2). Logic suggests Warner Bros. will blink and shift Tarzan to another date before 20th Century Fox budges on having Independence Day 2 in theaters by the Fourth of July holiday frame. We’ve still got over two years to go until then, so there’s a very good chance that at least oneof these four movies will have moved away by that time.

As we’ve said before, this is classic Spielberg: release two film in close proximity, with each movie being rather different in terms of style, budget, tone, and overall content. Spielberg has generally done very good work by using this approach, most recently with War Horse and Adventures of Tintinin 2011 – and even some of the best films of his career in the past (see: Jurassic Park andSchindler’s List in 1993). So, for our money, this is an encouraging development.

Sandy Schaefer blogs at Screen Rant.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.