'Once Upon a Time': How about that surprising introduction?

'Once Upon a Time' debuted a new character during the finale for its third season, which aired on May 11. 'Once Upon a Time' airs on ABC.

Jack Rowand/ABC/AP
'Once Upon a Time' stars Ginnifer Goodwin (l.) and Lana Parrilla (r.).

The ABC fairy tale mash-up series “Once Upon a Time” surprised many viewers with its latest season finale, which aired on May 11.

Season finales of the show often tease what new fictional world will be introduced in the next season (past universes have included the “Peter Pan” world and that of L. Frank Baum’s novel “The Wizard of Oz”), and the end of the season three finale appeared to tease the introduction of Queen Elsa from Disney's animated film "Frozen."

While “Pan” and “Wizard” are more established fantasy worlds, “Frozen” is comparatively new, with the film (which was based on Hans Christian Andersen’s “The Snow Queen”) having just been released this past November.

Questions still remain: Will Elsa be the new villain for the next season? (The movie “Frozen” concluded with Elsa having harnessed her powers over snow and ice, at peace with her sister Anna, and presumably ruling over the kingdom of Arendelle). Will the princess Anna, or other “Frozen” characters like Anna’s love interest Kristoff, be introduced? And will actress Idina Menzel, who voiced Elsa in the film “Frozen,” play Elsa in “Once,” or will the role go to someone new?

Some critics seem split on whether introducing such a new character is a good idea. Washington Post writer Emily Yahr noted that “Once” “managed to steal the spotlight in a huge way” and called Elsa’s introduction “a truly brilliant piece of product placement-engineered plot” and “a genius move that will only benefit both franchises.” 

Meanwhile, Entertainment Weekly writer Hillary Busis found it “a bit weird to think of Disney's newest royal almost immediately joining the ranks of old, established properties like Snow White and Belle," asking, "Is her introduction coming too soon?," though Busis noted that "we can't really answer that until we see how the show ends up handling Elsa – not to mention who ends up being cast as her.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.