Literature, dance, art explore masculinity

Acclaimed creators, including writer Paul Auster and artist Mark Bradford, are examining what it means to be a man in the modern world.

COURTESY OF SIMON WILSON
MEMBERS OF BLACK GRACE PERFORM ‘MINOI,’ WITH ARTISTIC DIRECTION BY NEIL IEREMIA.

In novelist Paul Auster’s recent book “4 3 2 1,” young Archie Ferguson closely observes the fathers, sons, brothers, and husbands around him. He knows his own father, Stanley, best, so he judges him most harshly. Stanley spends so much time at work he becomes distant, something his son “resented, or at least felt bad about, or that frustrated him, or made him angry, or some other word he hadn’t thought of yet.”

This anger, frustration, and struggle to connect is also evident in a piece New Zealand choreographer Neil Ieremia calls “Crying Men,” part of a larger work that will confront what it means to be a man in the modern world. Ieremia, whose Black Grace contemporary dance company toured the United States this spring, juxtaposes three dancers onstage. One crying man could be a child of the 1950s like Archie, exploring how to move in the world as a man. The others could be his younger self and his father. Love is evident, but so is the inability to express it.

This artistic preoccupation with the male role is taking place in a time of advancing lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender rights and an energized women’s movement. Another artist musing on these topics is Mark Bradford, whose “Shade” opened last year at the Albright-Knox Art Gallery in Buffalo, N.Y., and recently moved to the Denver Art Museum and the neighboring Clyfford Still Museum.

Bradford studied Still’s legacy and then created work of his own. Still numbered his paintings. Bradford, who is gay, named his monumental multimedia “Shade” paintings for styles of drag performance, which opens up a conversation about the machismo of earlier abstract expressionists, a subtext to the racial concerns that also are part of the show. Rebecca Hart, Denver Art Museum’s contemporary curator, said Bradford, who will represent the US at the Venice Biennale in May, is reading one of the fathers of abstract expressionism “from the vantage point of race and difference.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.