Mahershala Ali wins best supporting actor Oscar in 'Moonlight'

'Moonlight' is also nominated for best picture and best director for Barry Jenkins. Ali also starred in the best picture nominee 'Hidden Figures.'

David Bornfriend/A24/AP/File
Mahershala Ali (l.) and Alex Hibbert star in 'Moonlight.'

Actor Mahershala Ali has won the Oscar for best supporting actor for his work in the 2016 film “Moonlight.”

Mr. Ali portrays Juan, a drug dealer who befriends protagonist Chiron (Alex Hibbert). “Moonlight” is also nominated for such awards as best picture, best director, and best supporting actress for Naomie Harris.

Ali also appeared in multiple other projects this year, including another best picture nominee – the story of African-American women who worked at NASA in the 1960s, “Hidden Figures” – as well as the Netflix superhero series “Luke Cage” and the movie “Free State of Jones.” 

In his review of “Moonlight,” Monitor film critic Peter Rainer wrote that “Full-out, richly layered acting need not clash with the mood, as triumphantly demonstrated by Ali, Harris, [André] Holland, and [Janelle] Monáe. There may not be a better quartet of performances in a single movie this year.”  

In an interview with Indiewire, Ali said, “I had an emotional reaction to this project ['Moonlight']. That’s not par for the course for me. I could see and hear the characters, and had a good sense of the world. And I had wanted to work with Barry. It was the best ­– if more difficult – work experiences of my life.” 

Barry Jenkins is nominated for best director and best adapted screenplay, the latter of which he shares with Tarell Alvin McCraney, who wrote the play on which the film is based, "In Moonlight Black Boys Look Blue."

Mr. Jenkins said in an interview with The A.V. Club that he hoped the characters in his film, including Juan, went against stereotypes. 

"Tarell and I knew people like this growing up,” Jenkins said. “They exist. Juan is not the 'magical Negro' who sells drugs and teaches kids how to swim. Tarell was actually taught how to swim by a local drug dealer. I’m sure there are men just like him all over the country, who are doing some untoward things, but on the other hand, also do some very charitable and nurturing things. There’s room within these men for multitudes.” 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.