Apple won't shut down Beats Music, but it will probably revamp it

Apple denies that it will shut down Beats Music. What will Apple do with the fledgling Beats Music streaming service?

Lucas Jackson/Reuters/File
Commuters walk past a Beats brand display in the subway system of New York, May 29.

Will Apple end Beats Music or not? That is the question.

Monday, TechCrunch reported that Apple was planning to shut down Beats Music, an online music streaming service created by producer Jimmy Iovine and rapper Dr. Dre. Since the story broke, Apple's spokesman Tom Neumayr has announced, “This is not true.”

Apple bought Beats Electronics, known for its popular headphones, for $3 billion in May. Since then, Beats Music hasn’t done so well. While the exact number of users isn’t known, it’s believed that there are 250,000 paid subscribers to Beats Music. That’s far less than the industry giant Spotify’s 10 million paid subscribers and 30 million free users.

If Apple won't shut down Beats Music, then what will it do?

It’s believed that Apple will merge Beats Music and iTunes Radio. When Apple announced the acquisition of Beats Electronics, it wasn't clear what the company would do with its new streaming service. Apple suggested that Beats Music and iTunes Radio would coexist. A merger of Beats Music and iTunes Radio diverges from that statement, but it is in character with previous moves by Apple.

In 2009, Apple bought the music streaming service Lala. After the purchase, Apple moved Lala’s employees onto its iTunes team. Then, last year, Apple bought Embark and HopStop, two apps that provide public transit directions. Instead of leaving the companies intact, Apple moved the start-ups’ employees to Apple’s Maps service.

In some ways, the merger has already begun. In August, Apple put Ian Rogers, chief executive of Beats Music, in charge of iTunes Radio. 

Apple's acquisition of Beats was an attempt to gain a stronger foothold in online music streaming. Music streaming is an industry worth almost $1 billion globally. In 2013, users streamed 118 billion songs, according to Nielsen. Thirty percent of online consumers stream music and a fifth of those pay for the services, states a report by the research group Midia. The report predicted that "streaming and subscriptions will grow by 238 [percent] on 2013 levels to reach $8 billion in 2019."

Even with rising consumer use, most streaming companies are losing money, according to Bloomberg. Spotify has lost $200 million since its founding, according to a report last year by research firm PrivCo. Pandora has almost 70 million users but lost $40 million in 2013.

And as these companies lose millions of dollars, artists are complaining about about the minuscule royalties they are paid from streaming services. Damon Krukowski said his song would need to played 47,680 times on Spotify or 312,000 times on Pandora to equal the amount of money he would get from a single album sale, according to Bloomberg.

Though there are problems, it's believed that streaming is the future of the music industry, and Apple surely wants a part of the business. But it hasn't worked out thus far. Maybe a merger of Beats Music and iTunes Radio will change that.

“Apple’s next move will be key,” states a report by the research group Midia. “The acquisition of Beats and its streaming service was a statement of intent and a strategic shift of gears. Whatever Apple does could reshape the entire streaming market.”

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to

QR Code to Apple won't shut down Beats Music, but it will probably revamp it
Read this article in
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today