Bettina Wulff and the trouble with fighting Google's autocomplete

Bettina Wulff, Germany's former first lady, objects to Google's autocomplete. But suing the company may make things worse.

Google.com
Actual Google autocomplete suggestions

Germany's former first lady Bettina Wulff has sued Google over its autocomplete function. As people type words into the search engine, Google suggests additional terms that have been popular in previous searches. For example, after typing in "Boston," Google's autocomplete recommends "Boston weather" and the "Boston Globe" newspaper.

However, if you enter Ms. Wulff's name, the top suggestions are "Bettina Wulff escort" and the German word for prostitute.

A century ago, such rumors might have remained as whispers among the political elite. Now, baseless accusations can appear for even unsuspecting Google searchers. The Internet has always attracted unsavory gossip, but Wulff's lawsuit attempts to keep such smears out of Google's autocomplete.

Her odds are slim. German courts have sided with Google in five previous cases – mostly over people's names being linked to "fraud" or "bankruptcy." Google won these cases because of how its autocomplete works.

"Google does not suggest these terms – all of the queries shown in Autocomplete have been typed previously by other Google users," writes company spokeswoman Amanda Chang in an e-mail.

The search engine relies on algorithms to rank the popularity of previous searches. The most common phrases become the top suggestions. Location can affect the order – a Google search done in Washington, D.C., might find different autocomplete results than one done in Washington State. Breaking news can also sway results – searching for "earthquake" shortly after a major tremor will pull up different suggestions than the same search hours before.

Google has blacklisted certain words. It blocks autocomplete terms related to pornography, violence, hate speech, and illegal file sharing. When countries outlaw certain kinds of speech, such as Germany's ban on Holocaust denial, Google will remove those terms from its country-specific listings.

However, the company stresses that it does not police the algorithm beyond these few areas. This hands-off policy protects Google from lawsuits such as Wulff's. According to this line of thinking, the search engine can't be guilty of libel if it has no editorial oversight.

In fact, Wulff may be hurting her own cause. By publicizing the problem, she's inadvertently encouraging curious people to search for "Bettina Wulff escort," which will further buoy the term in Google's autocomplete. A poll for the German tabloid Bild am Sonntag found that 81 percent of Germans say they had never heard of these red-light allegations before Wulff's new book, "Beyond the Protocol," refuted them.

For more on how technology intersects daily life, follow Chris on Twitter @venturenaut.

[Editor's note: This is an updated version of an article that appeared in the October 8 issue of the Monitor weekly magazine.]

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.