Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare review roundup

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare review scores roll in Monday with some pretty positive remarks from the games press.

Activision
Kevin Spacey plays the main antagonist in Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare.

Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare released Monday. The so-called "Day Zero" edition lands November 3 with extra digital goodies, including two in-game weapons and faster progression through the online ranks. The regular edition arrives Tuesday.

Some news outlets have held back their official reviews until November 4 in order to see if the game's multiplayer servers can handle the initial rush of players. Several recent games have been overwhelmed by day-one demand, including the disappointing launch of last year's Battlefield 4, which received positive review scores before the game came out but became a buggy mess for weeks once millions of players signed on to play the game for themselves. This time around, some reviewers have taken a more cautious approach. 

But that has not stopped a flood of impression videos, review-in-progress articles, and some straight-up reviews. So how is Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare? Pretty good, according to early press accounts. Let's dive into the reviews.

Many of this year's most anticipated first-person shooters have focused on mobility. Titan Fall lets players sprint along walls and leap atop buildings. Destiny features mid-air jumps and teammates hovering above the battlefield. Advanced Warfare applies its own spin on mobility with the new exo suits. These futuristic exoskeletons enhance your character's skills, power, and movement. 

"It probably doesn't sound like much, but being able to get around the map more quickly and change your elevation with ease actually makes a huge difference," says Giant Bomb in its 4-out-of-5 review. "In single-player, it gives you new options and abilities to play with during a fun campaign with a story that would feel right at home in a typical, mindless summer blockbuster. In competitive multiplayer, being able to boost around corners to avoid incoming fire or dropping down off of rooftops and boosting behind an enemy feels outstanding."

Most reviewers were far more interested in the games characters and setting than its moment-to-moment story. Advanced Warfare stars Kevin Spacey – not just his voice, but also his likeness. He plays Jonathan Irons, the military-industrial-complex version of Frank Underwood from "House of Cards." As the head of a private military company, Mr. Irons unleashes a technological maelstrom that only the player can stop.

The story "tackles the issues of totalitarianism, fascism, and war on a slightly more cerebral level than prior iterations of the series; there’s a lot more going on here than taking on 'the terrorists' out of some forced patriotic narrative," says Game Informer in its favorable review. "Still, the campaign plods to a predictable conclusion after about seven hours."

But plenty of Call of Duty fans completely skip the single-player story for the fast-paced multiplayer, a mode that reviewers say does not disappoint.

"Since Modern Warfare [in 2007], Call of Duty has excelled at giving you rewards to earn in multiplayer," says IGN in its "review in progress." "Advanced Warfare follows that tradition, but greatly accelerates the pace. I quickly earned supply drops full of cosmetic items, new weapons, and temporary perks, like a double XP boost. Finding a gun I liked was great; finding another version of that gun with better stats and a cool weapon skin is even better."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.