30-day emoji challenge: Are we the new Egyptians?

Could you communicate through emoji alone? While a couple embraces these text-message symbols, a Monitor editor swears them off. 

|
Screenshot
The iPhone comes with a whole set of icons.

Has the overuse of emoji – those little pictograms we use to punctuate text messages – turned our society into the new Egyptians? A New York couple recently put these modern hieroglyphics to the test for 30 days, challenging both the parameters of the symbols and their relationship.

In order to decode this story, it may help to provide a few working definitions: emojis and emoticons are like ancient pictograms or individual images that represent ideas. Stringing those emojis and emoticons together to create a storyline or conversation composed solely of these images could be considered modern hieroglyphics.

This couple, Alex Goldmark and Liza Stark, has been together for 2 years, and decided to take a challenge issued by Mr. Goldmark's employer, the radio show New Tech City, to test visual communications and see if going all-in with emoji-only hieroglyphic communication might strengthen the relationship.

“I am not a visual thinker… but my girlfriend, Liza Stark, is very visual,” says Goldmark on the WNYC radio show. “So we signed up to be the New Tech City guinea pigs to see if this could help our relationship just a little bit.”

Goldmark adds, “We didn’t jump in blind. We downloaded all the apps we thought would help.” 

The couple used their favorite Chinese-made application, WeChat, instead of texting because there were more emoji available.

"It was important that we figured out how to define our vocabulary," Goldmark says during the segment. 

While this couple was using emoji as a visual communication test, one of the editors here at The Christian Science Monitor, Lane Brown, was forsaking all forms of emoticon, emoji, and texting-speak for a month. 

“Too often, I found that my checking in on a friend via text message made me sound like a middle-school cheerleader. ‘Give me a hi! Give me a ho! Tell me what you’re up to! I’d like to know! LOL!’ Capped off with a winking smiley,” Ms. Brown wrote in a recent blog

She adds, “The practice had also dribbled into my professional communications as well, with emails steadily shrinking in favor of shorter notes with exclamations serving as proof that I was not delivering an order or criticism, but instead making a really, really, really friendly suggestion that I hope you might accept.”

While Brown was on a visual-communications cleanse, there was a squelching effect on my own communications with her as I tried to follow her example out of courtesy. It was like choosing a salad when dining with your vegan boss.

“I did see a difference,” Brown wrote, “and I came to appreciate writing even the shortest notes more, taking a few extra seconds to craft each, which also helped me to remember what I was actually saying to people.” 

In both experiments, the end results seem to be that visual messaging will continue to play a powerful role in interpersonal and professional communications.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to 30-day emoji challenge: Are we the new Egyptians?
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/Tech-Culture/2014/0819/30-day-emoji-challenge-Are-we-the-new-Egyptians
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe