Snapchat belatedly issues patch – and apology – for Dec. breach

After a big breach in December, Snapchat has finally lurched into gear. 

The popular mobile photo messaging platform Snapchat has issued a new patch for its iOS and Android apps.

Back in late December, the Australian group Gibson Security released a report on the vulnerability of Snapchat, the popular messaging application. The names and phone numbers of Snapchat users, Gibson Security researchers alleged, could be easily obtained through gaping holes in the iOS and Android application programming interfaces, or APIs. 

A couple days later, a group of anonymous hackers used those holes to expose the personal information of 4.6 million Snapchatters. In response, Snapchat said it would employ "additional counter-measures" to prevent further hacks.

And today, the company – which recently received a valuation of $3.5 billion – has released an updated version of its Android and iOS apps. The update allows users to opt out of associating their phone numbers with their username, and "improves [the] Find Friends functionality," the same feature that Gibson Security highlighted as particularly susceptible to breaches. 

"Our team continues to make improvements to the Snapchat service to prevent future attempts to abuse our API," reps for Snapchat wrote in a post on the company blog. "We are sorry for any problems this issue may have caused you and we really appreciate your patience and support." 

But has the damage already be done? Over at Yahoo, Jeff Macke wonders why it took founder Evan Spiegel so long to respond to the initial Gibson Security report. 

"If the Internet has taught us anything about user masses its that they tend to be fickle. It doesn’t take much for an app to lose its mojo and there’s another 'Next Big Thing' right around the corner," Mr. Macke writes. "Snapchat’s breach and response call into question whether Spiegel is a Zuckerbergian wunderkind or 23-year old wise-ass. If its the latter it calls into question whether Snapchat has much to offer beyond fleeting appeal and buzz."

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to