Batman: Arkham Origins review roundup

Batman: Arkham Origins is the first game in the franchise to be developed by Warner Brothers Games Montreal. So does it live up to the Batman name? 

Warner Brothers
The Dark Knight and Deathstroke square off in the new video game Batman: Arkham Origins.

Batman: Arkham Asylum and Batman: Arkham City are two of the most critically-acclaimed video games of all time, and for good reason – both titles dexterously blended third-person combat with puzzle-solving in a well molded, visually impressive worlds. The third title in the series, Batman: Arkham Origins, moves back in time, and takes place shortly after Bruce Wayne first donned the cowl. 

This is also the first Arkham game to be developed by Warner Brothers Games Montreal, instead of Rocksteady, which handled both Asylum and City. Batman: Arkham Origins debuts this week on the Xbox 360, PlayStation 3, and Nintendo Wii U. Is it any good? Well, let's go to the reviews. 

The opening shot 

"Arkham Origins emerges as a remarkable game that adeptly adheres to Rocksteady Studios’ winning template," argues Scott Butterworth of Xbox Magazine. All the disparate parts – from combat to detective work to gliding and grappling around Gotham – feel just as expertly executed as they always have. And above all else, Origins manages to capture the single fundamental element that defines the franchise by making us feel like Batman – not some mindless action-game facsimile but the Dark Knight himself." 

The plot

The name of the game, writes Dan Stapleton of IGN, "is a flagrant misnomer – it may be a prequel, but this story is neither about Arkham, nor is it an origin story in any significant way. It’s more of a traditional Batman plot that retreads some of The Dark Knight’s most familiar themes over its roughly eight hours of main story content: a self-destructive insistence on working alone, and how far he’ll go to avoid taking a life – a concept the final battle cleverly toys with. It’s a respectable plot that even concocts a plausible reason for Batman to face so many villains all in one night – a $50 million bounty on his head." 

The script 

"The story begins as Black Mask, a gangster whose name suggests his costume, puts a hit out on Batman, the relatively new vigilante who has been crimping his business. Eight assassins come to Gotham City looking to cash in," notes Peter Nowak of the Globe and Mail. "The inevitable encounters... often devolve into clichéd dialogue, such as when a bo-staff wielding Deathstroke tells Batman, 'So, we meet at last.' Later, when Batman is looking for his nemesis the Joker, a henchman barks 'Go to hell,' to which he growls, 'Wrong answer.' This sort of stilted back-and-forth is straight out of 1970s Clint Eastwood movies." 

The world

"Because this is the first game in the series in which Batman isn’t confined to one part of Gotham," notes Steve Tilley of the Toronto Sun, "the Batwing can be used to travel between preset drop points, once they’re unlocked by disabling nearby jamming towers. It makes the game feel a bit less claustrophobic, maybe even slightly more relaxed." 

The world, a counterpoint

"The most noteworthy difference between Arkham Origins and its predecessors is a significantly larger open world," writes Carolyn Petit of Gamespot. "But that larger world has little meaning when the things you're doing in it are the same things the smaller world of the previous game accommodated perfectly well. Grappling up to rooftops and gliding through the air still feel great, but they don't feel any better here just because you have more rooftops to leap from." 

The boss fights

"[B]oss battles are one significant area where Origins feels like it's better than its predecessors," writes Evan Narcisse of Kotaku. "The Bane showdowns –yeah, there's more than one – are less of a goad-charge-dodge-attack endurance affair than in previous games. You feel like you're actually fighting and out-thinking the 'roided-out mercenary rather than reacting to his brute force. The fight with Firefly is a nice departure, too, changing up camera angles to top to side and creating a larger playfield for the flying pyromaniac to torment Batman. The reliance on quick-response prompts hasn't gone away but at least it's embedded in duels that show some varying approaches." 

The final word

"At its core, despite the flaws, there’s a decent Batman game here, since it still has the basic mechanics of Arkham Asylum and Arkham City," concludes Ray Carsillo of EGM. "But the game could’ve been so much more if WB Montreal had really tried to carry the series forward instead of trying to do their own impersonation." 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.