Gamergate: What it is and why it matters

The hashtag #gamergate gets thrown around a lot on Twitter, YouTube, and press sites. What's at the heart of Gamergate?

Online buzz and consternation around the term “Gamergate” may leave some wondering what it means and where it came from.

Two months ago, the hashtag #gamergate emerged in the wake of discussions online about the integrity of video game journalism. Those conversations – playing out on Twitter, YouTube, and online forums – were instigated by allegations of a conflict-of-interest by a games journalist at Kotaku, a popular gaming news outlet. The reporter was allegedly in a relationship with the developer of a game he reviewed. Kotaku editor-in-chief Stephen Totilo confirmed that the two were in a relationship, but added that the reporter had not written anything about the developer since it began – and the writer has never reviewed one of her games for Kotaku. 

However, once the allegations were made, Gamergate took on a life of its own. A subset of the movement escalated the discourse to threatening behavior toward some of gaming’s outspoken critics. 

Some self-declared Gamergaters have used the campaign as a reason to lash out at those they don't agree with in the gaming industry. For example, YouTube culture critic Anita Sarkeesian, who was scheduled to address Utah State University this month, withdrew from the event because of violent threats directed at her and the university. Ms. Sarkeesian is known for her critiques of how women are depicted in video games.

As more voices speak out in the Gamergate debate, it is difficult to determine how many of them are peacefully advocating for integrity in games journalism and how many are aggressively bullying the opposition. Those pushing for the former have secured small victories. Mr. Totilo posted a statement addressing “potential undue influence of corporate gaming on games reporting,” including a new policy of not allowing Kotaku writers to contribute to the development of games via crowdfunding services (think services such as Kickstarter and Patreon). 

Still, with most media coverage of Gamergate illustrating the darker side of gaming (particularly online bullying and a lack of empathy among gamers), Gamergate does bring to light a conversation about gaming culture that's increasingly relevant as gaming becomes a more widespread hobby.

Nearly 60 percent of Americans play video games, according to a study released in April by the Entertainment Software Association, a video games trade group. Of those gamers, 77 percent play with others for at least an hour a week. Without a welcoming community, the growing reach of gaming could stall – hence the importance of civility.

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.