T-Mobile knowingly charged customers for scams, regulators say

The Federal Trade Commission filed a complaint Monday alleging that T-Mobile made millions of dollars charging unknowing customers for third-party services such as horoscope information and celebrity gossip. 

(Stephen Brashear/AP Images for T-Mobile)
T-Mobile CEO John Legere introduces “T-Mobile Test Drive” during the T-Mobile Un-carrier event Wednesday June 18, 2014 in Seattle. A complaint filed by the Federal Trade Commission says T-Mobile charged customers for third-party services, even when customers had no knowledge of the services.

Federal regulators are filing a complaint alleging that T-Mobile customers have been scammed by their mobile phone provider. 

The Federal Trade Commission brought the lawsuit on Tuesday against T-Mobile USA on the grounds that "until at least December 2013" the wireless company made millions of dollars by charging for third-party services that were never authorized by customers and were often offered by scammers, according to the complaint

This is a process known as "cramming," whereby a phone company charges customers for services offered by another provider, yet the phone company receives a large percentage of those charges. In T-Mobile's case, according to the FTC, it was receiving somewhere between 35 and 40 percent of the total amount that consumers paid for dubious services such as ringtones, wallpaper, flirting tips, horoscope information, and celebrity gossip that often cost customers $9.99 a month. These practices "have caused consumers millions of dollars," the complaint states. 

The complaint further notes that T-Mobile's billing practices made it difficult for people to know they were in fact paying for these third-party services. In a customer's online bill, these charges were labeled under a heading called "Usage Charges." But this heading still did not show what exactly the individual charges were for. For example, under "Usage Charges" customers would be billed for things such as text messaging and "Premium Services." But the bill did not clarify that "Premium Services" also included third-party services, according to the complaint. Even the company's full 50-page phone bill did not adequately clarify that "Premium Services" included these external charges, the FTC says. 

The FTC is seeking a court order to end T-Mobile's practice of "mobile cramming" and to ensure refunds for T-Mobile customers. The FTC also says there is evidence that T-Mobile continued the practice of "cramming" even after receiving complaints at least as early as 2012. 

“It’s wrong for a company like T-Mobile to profit from scams against its customers when there were clear warning signs the charges it was imposing were fraudulent,” FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez said in a statement. “The FTC’s goal is to ensure that T-Mobile repays all its customers for these crammed charges."

The complaint says that T-Mobile, the fourth largest US mobile phone provider in terms of customers, has refused to refund some of its customers. It has offered only partial refunds to others and in some cases has urged customers to seek refunds from the scammers themselves. And in some instances, it has insisted that these charges were authorized even when customers had no record of the authorization, according to the complaint. 

For its part, T-Mobile announced in November of last year that it would no longer let third-party providers charge customers for premium services. And last month the company launched a new program to "proactively reach out" to customers who were billed for such third-party services and give them the opportunity to request a refund for these charges. 

"If you’ve been charged for a third-party service you didn’t sign up for, it should be easy to get a refund," Mike Sievert, Chief Marketing Officer for T-Mobile, said in a company blog post last month. "If customers were charged for services they didn’t want, we’ll make it right. That’s being the Un-carrier."

But in response to these recent allegations T-Mobile chief executive officer John Legere has recently stated that the real blame lies with the third-party providers.  

"We are disappointed that the FTC has chosen to file this action against the most pro-consumer company in the industry – rather than the real bad actors," Mr. Legere said in a company blog post. "As the Un-carrier, we believe that customers should only pay for what they want and what they sign up for."

In the past year, the FTC has sought to end mobile cramming, filing several lawsuits and holding a public workshop on the matter. 

The complaint was filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Washington. 

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.